Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kareem Hunt Allegedly Shoves A 19 Year Old Woman ...


Saca312

Recommended Posts

At first glance, this seems bad.

However, looks like there's more to the story.

Quote

According to the report, Hunt was with a group of several people visiting multiple Cleveland bars, and they all came back to Hunt’s house. But Hunt’s friend says Hunt asked Ottinger and another woman to leave when he found out they were too young to drink legally.

The two women left the apartment but stayed in the hallway outside. Ottinger says Hunt went outside and shoved her, while another woman says Ottinger hit her in the face when she told Ottinger to leave.

Well, what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the underage drinking stuff is true, she just got herself in way more trouble. She essentially just did a fuging islamic suicide bomb attack on him for a bit of recognition. Based on what's out, fug this bitch. Knowing Goodell he will suspend him for a long time regardless of context like Ezekiel Elliot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its an interesting "what would you do". Not wanting to be associated with under age drinking could be seen as a good thing. On the other hand if he didnt want these young ladies at his place, he should have called the police if they refused to leave. But if there were people at his party partaking in anything illegal.... that would potentially cause even more harm. At the end of the day, he should have listened to Cris Carter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...