Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OT CLIMBER


Recommended Posts

I think that this guy could be available in round 2 for us.  His motor might be a reason he drops.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000918873/article/nfl-combine-winnerslosers-saquon-barkley-puts-on-a-show

Kolton Miller, OT, UCLA: The former Bruin looked like a decathlete on the Lucas Oil Stadium turf while running through drills. The 6-9, 309-pounder breezed through the 40-yard dash in 4.95 seconds (with a remarkable 1.67-second 10-yard split), while also posting a 31.5-inch vertical and 10-foot-1 broad jump. Miller followed his dazzling athletic display with a strong positional workout where he exhibited outstanding movement skills and lateral quickness in drills. Although this enticing athleticism doesn't always show up on his game tape, Miller's stellar workout could propel him into the Day 1 discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I think that this guy could be available in round 2 for us.  His motor might be a reason he drops.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000918873/article/nfl-combine-winnerslosers-saquon-barkley-puts-on-a-show

Kolton Miller, OT, UCLA: The former Bruin looked like a decathlete on the Lucas Oil Stadium turf while running through drills. The 6-9, 309-pounder breezed through the 40-yard dash in 4.95 seconds (with a remarkable 1.67-second 10-yard split), while also posting a 31.5-inch vertical and 10-foot-1 broad jump. Miller followed his dazzling athletic display with a strong positional workout where he exhibited outstanding movement skills and lateral quickness in drills. Although this enticing athleticism doesn't always show up on his game tape, Miller's stellar workout could propel him into the Day 1 discussion.

OL isn’t getting addressed day 1 or even day 2 imo. There is more than enough depth if Norv can tweak the offense to not leave Cam out to dry. The OL doesn’t need high draft picks...our skill (lack thereof) positions need those picks. 

 

As Polian used to say...give me TD makers and guys that disrupt the QB in round 1-2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

I think that if we don-t take McGlinchey in the first,  then OT won't be addressed until day 3. The same with DE. 

That being said,  it's all about two of the three positions on day two: safety, receiver or  running back.

I would not be surprised if we bring Stewart back on a better deal.  

Safety is a no doubt but IMO DE and OL is a higher priority than RB and Receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I would not be surprised if we bring Stewart back on a better deal.  

Safety is a no doubt but IMO DE and OL is a higher priority than RB and Receiver.

We currently don’t have a guy I would trust to be a legit #1 guy at WR. Nobody is game planning for Funchess. Olsen used to be that guy...remains to be seen if he can return to pre-injury form. But there needs to be someone who can take the top off a defense. If Ridley (or another potential 1 WR) is there or if there is a RB the staff thinks is a Kamara-type home run threat then you take that guy. 

 

I would not sleep on Sony Michel. CMC gives Norv the flexibility to move him around to almost anywhere he wants. He does not have to be an exclusive RB. So giving him 7-8 carries a game and 10 targets a game could be a better use for him than lining him up in Norv’s eyes. So that leaves hopefully in this offense about 15-20 carries for a true #1. Michel could be that guy....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think D Williams and Moton are our future LT and RT

Too many other things we will need right away to put your 1st round plug and play pick behind 2 other guys and sitting on the bench.

Glaring hole at LG will need to be addressed to start with, maybe a safety although not sure one can start right away.  Possibly a TE or WR depending on what Turner thinks and then we will have to pick up a RB.  Most of this ahead of OT

2nd round maybe, but not first

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I would not be surprised if we bring Stewart back on a better deal.  

Safety is a no doubt but IMO DE and OL is a higher priority than RB and Receiver.

Basically what I'm saying is that after day 1, I think that all the O-Lineman and Defensive Ends worth spending a high pick on will be gone.  I still believe that you will be able to find day one starters, or at least better value, at the other positions,  particularly RB, safety and receiver. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, stbugs said:

I hope you think Morton is LT because I’ve seen people mentions Williams at LT and that’s a no go. He was a RT through college and is a RT only. If you watched him in preseason this year they tried him a few times at LT and he looked awful and they stopped doing that. We need to just leave him there and extend him and develop a LT, hopefully Moton. 

Yeah, I think Williams is by far best suited at RT. Unfortunately, I'm not sold on Moton at LT either. If we don't think he can play LT, then we need to just go ahead and kick him inside to LG and be done with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...