Jeremy Maclin. That'll be Hurney's Speedster

[RumHam]

Still more relevant that trade posts. Baltimore is set to cut him and keep Brandon Carr. Seems like Ravens are just dumping all their receivers including Wallace. Maclin, though, still has some youth and speed that would match brilliantly with Cam. 4 years/30 million, could definitely do it.

[Ricky Spanish]

I feel like Wallace would be the guy we target between the two. Faster, played with Turner before, not as much of an injury risk. 

Sucks about the injuries with Maclin, he was great when healthy but it will be a big concern with him moving forward. 

[imminent rogaine]

I'd take him in a heart beat. I think he is a low end #1 or high end 2 which is completely fine to paur with Funchess. he is a professional receiver. he will get seperation and make catches. Health has been his issue.

[RumHam]

I think he comes cheaper than Wallace. Do I want both? No. But would make getting Watkins a better chance. Funchess, Watkins, Maclin. He was under-utilized in KC and in BAL. 

[RumHam]

I just know if we only come away with paul richardson, that's a bad idea. He's Lockett 2.0.

[Rags]

There's no part of me that feels comfortable with signing Maclin and thinking everything's fine. That's literally what just happened with the Ravens.

I like him, but we'd need to bring someone else in as well.

[Saca312]

Just now, RumHam said:

I just know if we only come away with paul richardson, that's a bad idea. He's Lockett 2.0.

well paul richardson is not that good anyways so if we get him and give him a russell shepard like contract ill be pissed.

[Shocker]

Pass on Maclin even extra cheap. 

[top dawg]

If he could stay relatively healthy, I think that he'd be an extremely potent threat playing with Cam.  

The more threats, the better. 

[Jon Snow]

You guys are going to be so disappointed when all of these receivers y'all are arguing over signs somewhere else. 

 

Lol at Hurney finding a receiver.

[The Lobo]

Just get someone fast..him, Watkins, Wallace, heck even ARob bc he’s a deep threat.

[top dawg]

I certainly think he's more versatile and likely the better route runner, but Wallace's durability may make him the more practical target. 

It would be an interesting choice. 

Unlike some others,  I'll take two. Competition is not going to hurt Samuel.

[tiger7_88]

If he doesn't demand a huge contract, lets do it.

If he'll sign for $2 or $3M, OK.

If he wants any more than that, then uh uh.  His career is trending down and his next team will be his 4th in 9 years.  That SCREAMS red flag to me.

[tiger7_88]

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Trending way down. He doesn’t excite me at all. I’d much rather have Wallace. 

Oh, ab-so-tively agree about that.  Even at a higher price, Wallace is a better choice (though he comes with risks of his own).