Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What will the 2018 season look like with new helmet rule


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

No one hasn’t any clue. And that’s the major problem.

If the NFL enforces this rule to the letter, hen football as we’ve always known it is done. If they don’t, then what’s the point of having a rule? I sure as hell don’t want to see games influenced by crucial penalties on a wildly inconsistently officiated rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The subjectivity of this rule is even worse that pass interference.  I appreciate the desire to make the game safer, but this rule is just terrible in it's wording and then made worse when the NFL tried to clarify by saying that bracing for an impact is not a foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BrianS said:

The subjectivity of this rule is even worse that pass interference.  I appreciate the desire to make the game safer, but this rule is just terrible in it's wording and then made worse when the NFL tried to clarify by saying that bracing for an impact is not a foul.

WOW I knew about the new rule but I didn’t know that the rule was that ambiguous 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate that the league is trying to lessen severe head trauma. It's going to take a generation of new players before that happens consistently however. Habit are habits and these are lifelong habits. Compare it to how Ricky Manning Jr was a good cornerback until they changed the rules about contact and he couldn't adjust. The problem is that the refs not only have to, in real time, gauge where the helmets are but what the player's intent was. Courts of law have trouble determining intent, pity the ref. I predict longer games and 'biased' refs because of assumptions they're going to need to make. It's going to be ugly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what they’re trying to do with this. They’re trying to eliminate reckless play that creates unnecessary added risk to the game. What they really want is a rule giving the ref the freedom to throw a flag in situations where a player makes a play that’s gonna break his damn neck or someone else’s neck. They’re trying to actively avoid the next Ryan Shazier situation. But, trying to write that into an actual rule that can be fairly and consistently officiated is an entirely different beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I first heard about the new ruling ,,  interior offense and defensive lineman will be treated like all players lowering their helmet..   tell me that wouldn't be a cluster %$#&.. 

Think of all the running backs that leap over the pile for short yardage on the goal line or for a first down..

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OceanPanther said:

When I first heard about the new ruling ,,  interior offense and defensive lineman will be treated like all players lowering their helmet..   tell me that wouldn't be a cluster %$#&.. 

Think of all the running backs that leap over the pile for short yardage on the goal line or for a first down..

 

 

Yep. If it's enforced to the letter of the law, line play as we know it is over. The three point stance is gone. Exploding out of a three point stance and into the opposing line is effectively banned from the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, motocross_cat said:

If this rule is truly enforced then the xfl has a chance.

Yep. The game of football at the NFL level would become virtually unrecognizable overnight. The game would become much, much more finesse based. Linemen as we know them today would be rendered virtually useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I project this will be just as confusing as the catch rule of which we still have no precise definition.

 

Go back to the leather helmets and players will stop tackling with reckless abandon or lowering their heads prior to launching themselves like missiles into opposing players. Could also decrease concussion risk/occurrence all while minimizing overly descriptive rules that have no firm definition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
    • I thought victory Mondays was pretty standard 
×
×
  • Create New...