Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jackson may not deserve this nickname yet, but I'm giving it to him


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Once he goes through his growing pains (including not over-pursuing), Donte "Action" Jackson just might become a notable corner in the league. The kid has obviously got some talent and skills and...swag! Let's see if he can corral that "wild stallion-esque" type quality into fundamentally sound focused aggression.

Anyway, getting to the reason for the thread, the name "Donte 'Action' Jackson" is cool and all. It is. But it's a little long (especially for writing). I've seen some refer to him as D-Jax. Well, we know that's not gonna fly. I've seen D-Jac. Well that just doesn't sound right. It's like a bootleg version of D-Jax. And Jac is just too close to "jacked" for my liking, so I was thinking..."Donte Action Jackson...Action  Jackson..." :thinking:  Then it came to me..."A-Jax!" 

A-Jax, Ajax (whatever), the name for him is A-Jax! You saw him clean up that third down play last night. 

A-Jax it is!

Screenshot_20180825-083224.thumb.png.a54a8d2e5b19c17ad967efffbc0049b2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure he was out of position last night on a wr screen and let someone get to the edge. other than that he played well. gotta imagine he'll be a starter going into the season.

the best part about jackson is you can tell he's the kind of player who literally never stops talking poo on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jackson looked like a rookie and had good plays and bad just like Corn. He wasn't great and didn't suck. But he played with heart and speed neither of which you can coach. You either have it or you don't. In time he will improve and be a legitimate starter. As for the name I thought Cam had dibs on that honor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...