Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sean Lee is Luke Kuechly


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Aikman was verbally fondling Lee during the broadcast yesterday

Pretty much this. Not sure which one said it but they said something like the only thing that has been the difference was Lee being hurt more. They've both played 86 games at this point, despite Lee being in the league 2 years more. You can't look at their stats and accolades and tell me these two are anywhere near the same level. 

Sean Lee is a solid LB....one of the best right now. Luke is THE best playing the position now and one of the best to ever play it. Both may get a gold jacket at the end of their careers, but Luke will have earned it. Lee would only get it because he was a cowboy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chaos said:

Right after Kuechly's first tackle Joe Buck referred to him as the best linebacker in the game or league cant recall which word he used, but no doubt he said best.  

Best NFL LB is the history of football...or something like that.  And Lee is good but not Luke good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not know Lee still played for Dallas until  around the late second quarter.  That must have been when he got his tackle...

Going out on a limb here--Yes, I remember the Bear LBs.  I know Wagner is a good player--but Luke is, if you consider his entire game, from intelligence to first step to toughness to speed--the best MLB to ever play.  There are no equals--even if Buck is trying to kiss Aikman's butt by singing the Cowboys' praises.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...