Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where does DJ Moore's first NFL reception rank among the all time greats?


CatTower

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, CRA said:

DJ Moore ain't no average dude.  He is 89's spirit animal for a reason.  He didn't go down in college like no punk either.   That terrible tacking effort brings down a lot of our WRs. 

I am no fan of Jennings the commentator but he was spot on about a critique of Fun Fun.  Not to jump topics.  But a lot of our players make catches with the intent of going down when they catch it. 

I dont know whats the deal with Fun falling down on all his catches this year.  He was doing that last year as he had a lot of YAC. Its weird. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I dont know whats the deal with Fun falling down on all his catches this year.  He was doing that last year as he had a lot of YAC. Its weird. 

Not weird as much as he's is what he is he's playing hard trying giving efforts and that's the final product. Can't bet mad I like Fun but it's time to even out the snap counts if we have to have somebody help make sure he knows his play then dam it do what it takes just make sure DJ gets chances there's a reason he was the first WR taken, if he's struggling adjust adjust adjust to compensate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, RumHam said:

video unavailable. But yeah, the fact he was mostly absent the first two games is sad for a first round pick, who's supposed to have an immediate impact.

He's being taught three positions so that when he is in the game we will be able to move him all around the field and not be hampered by his lack of knowledge of certain plays or concepts. He has a high ceiling, but there is no reason to teach him one position and throw him out there to only play that one position. If anything, his learning the three positions will serve the team better for longer than had he learned one position at a time. You can't simplify the entire offense to get one player involved. I suspect he will be ready to go in Week 5 and will likely see around 5 or 6 targets this week. 

When a player only knows 28% of the playbook, and every time you put him out there is to get him the ball, it makes it easier for the defense to scheme to stop him. Letting him learn the offense completely will make him, and our entire unit, far more dangerous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...