Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Damiere Byrd may be inactive this Sunday despite being healthy


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Of course, the better scenario would be Ron Rivera saying Samuel has kick return duties while Damiere Byrd mans the punt returns. Which would make more sense.

I don't see why we shouldn't have Damiere Byrd active given his explosive ability in the return game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Well, depending on how you take Ron's verbiage, you could deduct this might be the case.

Josh Klein from Roaring Riot gives his interpretation of Ron's coach speak.

 

Dam

Dude looks like our best return guy

Samuel looked like our best WR  this camp

Moore shows promise oozing potential. And is a 1st rounder

 

While Smith has been hands down our worst WR and will get one of those guys jerseys just because the pure fact that he's a "vet" sucks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe he will be active,  but just doing punt returns. Rivera has got to stop limiting our guys for vets. If your not ready to do long bombs why play Smith let someone else see what they can do with his snaps tired of seeing him drop balls. He is a vet should have no problem being ready when or if his name is called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet another stupid thread.

anyone that follows this team knows that Rivera is saying Samuel is on kick return duties. So that tweet is also stupid.

Samuel has never once played the role of punt returner for us. Not even preaeason.

 

That line from Rivera has no bearing on Byrd being active or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard to carry 6 active WRs without really sacrificing someplace else particularly when the 6th WR will not see the field on offense and doesn't offer anything in other parts of special teams. In our case, we would either need to make an another LB inactive which hurts us in all 4 phases of special teams rather than just the PR unit or make another DE inactive which means we would potentially have to push Peppers snaps a lot higher than is desirable this early in the season.

Now the ideal situation is to bench/cut Torrey Smith but we know that's not happening anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, je1005 said:

It’s always nice to hear what peripheral media members believe a coach might or might not be inferring.

 

Fun Fact: Josh is one of two media members outside of Panthers.com to go to every practice, event, and game. 

Jourdan is the other. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...