Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ted Ginn up for trade?


TN05

Recommended Posts

What's it matter if Byrd is out a few weeks? We're not really throwing him the ball, or to Moore or Samuel all that much. Might as well wait for him to come back and hope he makes plays when he gets the chance.  I see some here wanting to unload Byrd but it doesn't hurt us to keep him when we aren't even throwing the ball that well right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure there's any indication the Saints want to trade him, but even if there were, would they really trade him to a division rival they're going to see twice before the season's over?

And again, if they do, that sounds like one of those trades where they ask for four fingers, both nuts and an eye in return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not sure there's any indication the Saints want to trade him, but even if there were, would they really trade him to a division rival they're going to see twice before the season's over?

And again, if they do, that sounds like one of those trades where they ask for four fingers, both nuts and an eye in return.

Yep... and it ain't like Ginn left on good terms.

But the Saints would never trade him to us, and especially since we are still going to play them twice before the end of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TN05 said:

If Byrd is going to be out long-term, this might be worth a trade. Could pick up punt/kick return duties and also replace Byrd and Torrey Smith. He's not a great receiver but he's faster than Torrey and Cam trusts him.

Offer them CAP for Ginn, straight-up.

Edit: And then cut Torrey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would we trade anything of value for someone that doesn't want to play for us?

That bridge was already wobbly when he signed with the Saints, but it was basically lit on fire in the playoffs last season. He made how he felt about the Panthers pretty clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Why would we trade anything of value for someone that doesn't want to play for us?

That bridge was already wobbly when he signed with the Saints, but it was basically lit on fire in the playoffs last season. He made how he felt about the Panthers pretty clear.

I don't know why these things surprise people. It's a business. You wouldn't want to stick it to your former employer if they didn't want to pay you what you felt you were worth and a competitor offered you more? Of course you would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...