Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We didn't lose because of Cam, Luke, or Coaching


TN05

Recommended Posts

We lost because we made mistakes early. That's it. You don't win against Alex Smith when you go down 17-0. Alex Smith doesn't make mistakes that let you come back very often. The fact of the matter is, if DJ Moore doesn't fumble twice we win, and we nearly won even with that.

We had three turnovers and only allowed 23 points. That's not bad. We had three drives in the second half and scored on two of them and nearly on the third. That's about as good as you can get. The sky isn't falling. We just have to stop turning the ball over.

Does this mean there's no issues with coaching or performance? Of course not. We should have went for it on fourth and one. We should have been more aggressive early. Eric Reid shouldn't have blown coverage. Curtis Samuel and CJ Anderson should have had more time. But that's not why we lost: we lost because of turnovers. And that's fixable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the turnovers were the main culprit. But our defense's inability to get off the field meant our offense had little opportunity to answer or get in a rhythm. They spent the majority of the game on the sidelines. Then for some reason when we got in the redzone late with plenty of time and two timeouts we were focused only on the endzone and not on moving the sticks, whether that was Cam, the play calling, or a combo of both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone that's willing to overlook three failed attempts to gain 5 yards in a game winning situation is willfully putting the blinders on.  That game was there for the taking, period.  You can make any excuse you like from earlier in the game but that's all conjecture.  You truly have no idea how the game would have unfolded if those turnovers hadn't happened.  We do however know without doubt that we had an opportunity to win the game on the last drive and completely blew it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes it's one move that can send things spiraling, and begin a momentum shift. Obviously the turnovers were the real momentum shift, but the move that sent things spiraling was treating our first drive as inconsequential. If our defense isn't going to be what it once was then we need to set the tone offensively, especially on the road. Our failure to do so basically doomed us from the jump. We spent the whole game trying to claw our way back. That's coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, just wish we were good enough to overcome those issues. Instead, we all got to see why we are not.

Coaches couldn't adjust going down 17 points and our offense couldn't execute a game winning drive, and that, to me, was more sad to see than the fumbles.

The defense was gassed and I can't put much blame on them other than not getting any pressure on Smith until it was too late. Coaching, QB and offense (including fumbles) though needs to be able to overcome mistakes like the great teams do.

Panther fans have gotten so used to a great defense, when we don't have an elite top 5 D, the blame shifts to them. But in today's league, scoring 30 points in pretty common and with all that's been invested in the Panther's offense and the Oline playing lights out, this game should have been won by the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, the turnovers were the main culprit. But our defense's inability to get off the field meant our offense had little opportunity to answer or get in a rhythm. They spent the majority of the game on the sidelines. Then for some reason when we got in the redzone late with plenty of time and two timeouts we were focused only on the endzone and not on moving the sticks, whether that was Cam, the play calling, or a combo of both.

It also didn't help our defense when our offense and special teams put them back on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TN05 said:

We lost because we made mistakes early. That's it. You don't win against Alex Smith when you go down 17-0. Alex Smith doesn't make mistakes that let you come back very often. The fact of the matter is, if DJ Moore doesn't fumble twice we win, and we nearly won even with that.

We had three turnovers and only allowed 23 points. That's not bad. We had three drives in the second half and scored on two of them and nearly on the third. That's about as good as you can get. The sky isn't falling. We just have to stop turning the ball over.

Does this mean there's no issues with coaching or performance? Of course not. We should have went for it on fourth and one. We should have been more aggressive early. Eric Reid shouldn't have blown coverage. Curtis Samuel and CJ Anderson should have had more time. But that's not why we lost: we lost because of turnovers. And that's fixable.

I agree and disagree. I agree that the turnovers put us in a bad position early,  but i don't agree that it's the reason we lost. I believe that primarily,  we lost because of poor execution in all phases of the game, in conjunction with passive playcalling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
    • Lot of passion there.  Look, if Bryce plays down to the level that we feel the need to draft a QB high, you don’t think the locker room might be ready for anything that helps them win?   There are s lot of angles to this that could come into play depending on what happens this year. 
×
×
  • Create New...