Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

which player does this forum overrate the most?


Recommended Posts

Hard to say, because your forum is so up and down lol. One week, a player is the GOAT. The next, they're trash. One week the place is Homer Central. The next, you're harsher critics than rivals. 

Imo, so far this season, probably Bradberry. He's been toasted a lot and bailed out by poor throws and drops, including last week vs. Mike Evans. A couple plays to Jeffery stick out as well. Just depends on the week and who the GOAT/scapegoat is lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't as bad anymore but people on this forum used to talk up Damiere Byrd like he was a legend.

In general this forum (I'm guilty of it too) has a really bad tendency overrating receivers.  Byrd and Gettis (although he could have lived up to the hype if not for injuries, so I'll excuse that) are easy ones off the top of my head.  And who could forget Kenneth Moore?  My lord, this site made him sound like the next Jerry Rice.  This site went through a phase with Louis Murphy for awhile too until we all saw how much he sucked.  And Philly Brown, hell there are probably to this day who still think he was the real deal.

oh and there was a small subset of fans begging for Marvin McNutt lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've been screaming for DE for months. Forbidden topic indeed. 
    • Great post! Now that I think on it, I think D line might be our biggest need. We are one player away from having a potential disastrous defensive line. Brown and Wharton struggled last year and Wharton has really only been a rotational player that specializes in one thing. Can we count on him being a full time starter? Jackson is unproven. Do you want a starting defensive line of Wharton, Brown and Jackson? I don’t want to risk it.   I honestly don’t think linebacker is that big of a need. If Rozeboom ends up coming back then why get a LB?   games are won in the trenches and I would honestly prefer us drafting an offensive or defensive linemen over any other position in the first. The prospect you mentioned seems like a good prospect who has had some good production as well. Only problem is defensive line is a position that can take time for a player to develop. Will whoever we draft be ready this season ? 
    • Have they though? I'll give you KC with Kelce, but c'mon, they weren't winning those SB's because they had a great TE, it was a combination of Mahomes and some great defenses.  Will also give you the 49ers and Ravens with Kittle and Andrews, but even then, both have missed time with injuries the last few years. After those 3 teams, the best teams of the last 2-3 years have not had elite TEs The Eagles had Goedert, he's good, not great. The Bills have also had good but not great TE's The Rams have had average TEs and still consistently run 2 and 3 TE sets with them and still win. The Bucs have been winning the South without a great TE The Lions' Laporta is more a name than a highly productive TE. The Texans have had a serviceable TE in Shultz, but nothing too amazing. Some of the best TE's in the league the last few years have been on some of the worst teams.  McBride, Bowers, Warren, Njoku, even Pitts this past year. A true elite TE is absolutely a weapon in today's game, but I think the best teams use that money elsewhere and find serviceable TE play, usually through a committee where each TE brings something else to the table.
×
×
  • Create New...