Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We've lost SEVEN games by a touchdown or less


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Second most in franchise history, I believe, trailing only this season's spiritual equal, the 2001 Panthers. Our last five losses were by a combined 20 points.

It is a crazy number... that's what makes me frustrated with some of the negative nancies...  I lived through 2001 and 2010... this is not it...

The pass rush needs upgrading, and Washington as DC was a bust 

Cams shoulder and lack of deep ball.

Those are the only things I worry about for next year.

The difference between 11-5 and 5-11 is not big in the NFL... 

Last year we overachieved... this year we underachieved.

Next year is next year... and as long as we get some pass rush and get Cam healthy we have a shot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PhillyB said:

that's how football was lost back in my day

7-10 losses

back when football was REAL

-ron rivera

It’s actually crazy when you think of how many seasons we’ve had where success or failure was determined by 7 points per game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats what happens when you have a gutless, spineless, limp dick, braindead, stuck-in-the-80s coach...  your games are decided upon a razor's edge.  It's why his coaching is outdated...  a single score decides whether he is a good coach or a bad coach, and he can't win in consecutive seasons, so what does that tell you?  Are the wins the norm, or are the losses the aberration?  If almost all of your games are decided by a single score, and you're hovering around .500 for your career besides one season your team caught lightning in a bottle and played out of their minds, i'd say that's a good sign that you have very little influence over your team's outcomes...

Which means, you suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Thats what happens when you have a gutless, spineless, limp dick, braindead, stuck-in-the-80s coach...  your games are decided upon a razor's edge.  It's why his coaching is outdated...  a single score decides whether he is a good coach or a bad coach, and he can't win in consecutive seasons, so what does that tell you?  Are the wins the norm, or are the losses the aberration?  If almost all of your games are decided by a single score, and you're hovering around .500 for your career besides one season your team caught lightning in a bottle and played out of their minds, i'd say that's a good sign that you have very little influence over your team's outcomes...

Which means, you suck.

Pretty much. Ron's philosophy has a slim margin for error. We consistently try to do just enough to win. We'll take the foot off the gas when we're rolling and then ask the D to try to hang on. Then he blames player execution if it doesn't work out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, I miss when the close losses actually used to hurt.  

I haven't emotionally cared about a loss since after the Lions game.  Everything since has been numbing.  Probably won't see another Panthers win until 2019... which is sad to think about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Montsta said:

It’s actually crazy when you think of how many seasons we’ve had where success or failure was determined by 7 points per game. 

this is a direct result of the style of play Rivera plays though.  If you grind the playclock and limit total possessions, you're bound to have closer game games because each team has fewer possessions.  That IMO makes Rivera's inability to consistently pull out those victories even worse because he's the one setting that stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other issue with this is that you have a physically dominant QB who historically isn’t the most accurate, has the ability to take over a game other ways, but you’re forcing to be precise and have a small window for error. We continue to put Cam in situations where he has to save us, but not with his running. With his arm. Enter in the fact his arm is hurt, and the whole philosophy is asinine. Enter in the additional part where our HC is terrible at game/clock management and it’s one of the more ridiculous plans you can think of.

This is where the strategic part of being a coach isn’t there for Rivera. He is a ceteris paribus (“if all other things are the same”) coach, in a league where nothing stays the same. You have to recognize football is situational. 

There are only 3 certainties - death, taxes, and Luke Kuechly ballin the eff out IF you don’t give him a crappy DC.... which Ron did too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...