Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Miller’s top 50 draft prospects


raleigh-panther

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I’m confused because you are both wrong. We have two picks in the top 50 and 56 isn’t one of them. We have pick 16 and 47. To be clear there are 4 7-9 teams so we move up one spot in each round. So round 2, we pick 15th not 16th.

Also, we have pick 14 (78) in round 3 and pick 13 (109) in round 4. We will also have a 3rd round comp pick for Norwell. I’d imagine that will be pick 99 or 100. Our 4th round pick will also slot down based on all the 3rd round comps.

We’ve got a real nice bunch of picks (so close to being great after the worst case scenario happened). Likely 16, 47, 78, 100 and 115.

Fixed. I fat fingered it. Thanks for the call out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think we need to aim at shoring up the OLine. Tackle, Center, then look for an edge rusher since the draft runs deep. Let Efe work with the one's. But if we can shore up that offensive line for the future, wouldn't you rather want that? However, i'm sure Hurney will aim at the best player at a position that no one is taking that way his supporters say he's great in drafts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like matt miller just fine. but his podcast is absolute trash. Listened to one episode and his co-host immediately started with the idiotic, espn, mainstream take that "Cam Newton is teh badz at throwing the football. Iz a RB. He Suckzzzz" 

This was sometime after Cam's incredible performance last year in the playoffs against NOLA. called Matt out on twitter to back up this claim in a very nice way, no response. 

Yea go fug yourself buddy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...