Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I certainly haven't anointed Kyle Allen as the QB2


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I have seen some people here speak with a certain amount of surety that Kyle Allen should be Cam's backup. Me? I'm not buying it until I see it. And, sorry, a game against an unmotivated Saints defense in the last game of the season doesn't do it for me. I thought that Heinike looked similarly suspect  (but maybe a bit better due to his mobility when he had time to throw versus Atlanta). And then there is the somewhat Huddle-maligned  rookie who will probably only need to get up to speed to legitimately compete with the other two. So Allen gets no pass in my mind, and I just simply raise an eye when hearing people claim that he should be our QB2 based upon so little---almost nothing.

FWIW, it's still May, but I'd like to point out what was said in the Riot Report today in reference to Allen and the QB battle (which really should be of more attention and importance in the minds of fans in my estimation).

"Team drills began with an interception from Luke Kuechly – the first of two for the All-Pro linebacker off of Kyle Allen – and featured a fumble recovery from Andre Smith that would have gone for a touchdown had this been a real game. Smith thinks that the new look of the Panthers defense will be extremely helpful for Kuechly – Rivera said after practice he’s seen a lot of inside linebackers be extremely successful with a three-man front in front of them. It isn’t necessarily a surprise to see the defense holding strong against the Panthers’ three backup quarterbacks, but Taylor Heinicke continues to look – at least to me – the most polished of the three; it will be interesting to see where they are once training camp begins in August."

https://theriotreport.com/dispatches-from-panthers-otas-week-2/

As far as I'm concerned, no one should be exclaiming Allen as the best choice to back up Cam so early in this process. He's going to have to win that honor, and it's basically a guess as to whether he can/will do it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don’t take it so personal... I think

we are all hoping for solid competition at the backup position. No one is being “anointed.”

also, we should celebrate that Luke can be all worldly not matter what formation we run, as opposed to attacking one of our backups for throwing a pick to the best MLB in the game....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think anyone has anointed Kyle Allen as QB2...but I’ll personally take one half of an actual NFL game against an “uninspired” Saints defense over the collective training camp QB performances with their untouchable red jerseys. Say what you want about the Saints’ effort in the finale, but a QB still needs to get the ball where it needs to be and Allen showed excellent accuracy and touch...including the first long TD pass I think I’ve seen from us in about 2 full seasons. He also showed great poise in the pocket. I think people are dismissing Allen’s performance because they think the Saints basically rolled over in that game, but everything in his control, he did very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MasterAwesome said:

I don’t think anyone has anointed Kyle Allen as QB2...but I’ll personally take one half of an actual NFL game against an “uninspired” Saints defense over the collective training camp QB performances with their untouchable red jerseys. Say what you want about the Saints’ effort in the finale, but a QB still needs to get the ball where it needs to be and Allen showed excellent accuracy and touch...including the first long TD pass I think I’ve seen from us in about 2 full seasons. He also showed great poise in the pocket. I think people are dismissing Allen’s performance because they think the Saints basically rolled over in that game, but everything in his control, he did very well

I am not dismissing his work, what I am saying is that he hasn't done nearly enough. I can easily say that people are dismissing Heinicke's work, as well as being dismissive of Grier before he even gets a chance to compete. The competition will be won in August.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I am not dismissing his work, what I am saying is that he hasn't done nearly enough. I can easily say that people are dismissing Heinicke's work, as well as being dismissive of Grier before he even gets a chance to compete. The competition will be won in August.

True...I don’t think anyone is advocating just handing Allen the #2 QB job. Between those people anointing Allen as the undisputed #2 QB and those saying all Allen did was beat up on a bunch of unmotivated backups (I.e. dismissing his performance), there are way more people in the latter group.

You also said Heinicke looked “similarly suspect”, insinuating that Allen did look suspect in his playing time...I’m not sure what you saw that was suspect out of him, other than perhaps his durability. Obviously there’s the legitimate argument that there’s too small of a sample size to be anointing Allen, but I’m not sure how you can think Heinicke showed more than Allen in their respective limited playing times. Heinicke looked pretty solid in his opening drive against Atlanta, then went downhill after that. Allen went 4-4 for 38 yards against Atlanta and was solid throughout the entire Saints game until his injury.

I’ve seen more people anointing Grier as the #2 QB over Allen simply because of his draft position. Regardless, I would say most reasonable people recognize that there’s a pretty wide open 3-way competition for backup QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allen has the strongest arm of the backup quarterbacks, so it's pretty natural that the majority prefer him. 

He was 3rd string for a reason. 

It was good that they both got some live time.

I thought Heinike actually showed more leadership. 

that being said, I'm thrilled the team is doing what it can to increase competition, and develop quarterbacks. It IS necessary.  Who becomes the main backup won't come down to fan favorite.  The pros know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, top dawg said:

I have seen some people here speak with a certain amount of surety that Kyle Allen should be Cam's backup. Me? I'm not buying it until I see it. And, sorry, a game against an unmotivated Saints defense in the last game of the season doesn't do it for me. 

 

What’re you talking about? According to the huddle no one tried to lose that game and each team played their heart outs until the end. It was our super bowl, a game to remember and cherish forever. We beat a playoff team! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh nooo, it’s the bitter “We should’ve tanked!!” crowd, resurfacing...one month after the draft. They’ll be sitting around the fireplace with their grandkids 40 years from now, shaking their fist at the sky about that time the genius Sean Payton strategically outwitted stupid Ron Rivera by telling his backups to deliberately throw the game against our backups. CHESS VS. CHECKERS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...