Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PI Review Rule not settled


trueblade

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

it would go along way for the fans if we held the officials accountable to their mistakes

Not directly to your point, but this is my main concern with the "eye in the sky" approach as it gives the NFL an invisible hand to manipulate games. At the moment, we can at least see where officials were when a call was missed and determine if they had any chance of making it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OneBadCat said:

Don't drop it all. Get their ass in gear, fix the rule and let the plays be reviewable. Anything to keep the refs from deciding the games. This is a huge opportunity to move the sport forward and make a fairer game.

Do you really think Newton will get more calls that go his way? The same refs that looked the other way when he took head shot after head shot. It will hurt us more than help us. It will help Brees, Brady, Rodgers though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stbugs said:

The Hail Mary will be seen far more often now even before halftime. Why not just take a shot? Worst case is nothing. Best case has improved a ton because there’s always some sort of pushing on that play and if you get the review you’ll get a TD shot or a FG. Heck, you could be at your 10 yard line and have a chance at a long FG or a second Hail Mary with a penalty and a free down if time expires. 

I am already waiting to see what an unbelievable shitshow this is going to be. We are all aware at how ham-handed the NFL's attempts to roll out new rule enforcements typically are. Oh well, at the end of the day, you just hope we come out on the winning end of all of these BS calls that are about to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FakePlasticTrees said:

I think many offensive pass interference calls that have not been made in the past will end up being called by review officials.

I don't think you will see almost any OPI calls from reviews. The league has basically already decided in the past that OPI is not a priority. Points, points, points!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think you will see almost any OPI calls from reviews. The league has basically already decided in the past that OPI is not a priority. Points, points, points!!

Your point is one of the reasons why the league does not want to have this replay. The coaches pushed for it and review officials will not be able to ignore OPI like officials on the field have. This will likewise cause officials to start calling OPI more often.

In other words, this will end up being another "be careful what you wish for, you just might get it". It might also benefit defense-minded teams and zone concepts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, FakePlasticTrees said:

Your point is one of the reasons why the league does not want to have this replay. The coaches pushed for it and review officials will not be able to ignore OPI like officials on the field have. This will likewise cause officials to start calling OPI more often.

 In other words, this will end up being another "be careful what you wish for, you just might get it". It might also benefit defense-minded teams and zone concepts.

I highly doubt that will happen, but we will see soon enough. My prediction is that it just turns into the "was it a catch or not a catch" nonsense we had to deal with for two seasons. I think you will see dramatic variations in what is called PI and what is not called PI in video reviews. 

It's already a pretty subjective call, much like holding on the offensive line, that could virtually be called on every passing play. If OPI is on the table, will there be reviews of illegal pick plays? Those are rampant in the NFL.

I just don't see a real way this doesn't turn into a complete nightmare. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's the ticky tack PI calls and then there's the non call like in the Taints playoff game. I personally would be fuming if that had happened to the Panthers. It wasn't close, that was just flat out obvious and should have been a penalty. Just like if a guy trips over his own feet near a defender shouldn't be an automatic 35yd spot foul. Make PI a 10 yard penalty, no auto first down and move on. Sure they won't get it right all the time, but it would reduce the impact of a single play like a 60 yard hail mary at the end of halftime or the 4th hoping for a PI call. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I almost completely stopped watching the NFL in the midst of the soap opera "Catch or Not a Catch."  I watched a total of about 3 games worth in 2017, and two of those were complete Panthers' games (last game of the year and the playoff game were televised here in the desert).

It was not the officials getting them right or wrong.  I can handle that.  The last straw was when I developed a keen ability to say "that was a catch/incomplete, but I know they are going to find a way to screw it up" when they went to instant replay.....and my assessment being correct well more than half the time.

I can think of two things more irritating than the on-field officials getting a call wrong.  The runner up is them getting it wrong and the call gets upheld on replay.  But the worst thing is them getting it right and replay overturning it.  That has happened far too often for my tastes and it will happen with this rule just as much as the catch/no catch debacles.

I have a saying that the worst thing you can do to anybody is give them exactly what they want.  This smells like another proof of that coming in 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

There's the ticky tack PI calls and then there's the non call like in the Taints playoff game. I personally would be fuming if that had happened to the Panthers. It wasn't close, that was just flat out obvious and should have been a penalty. Just like if a guy trips over his own feet near a defender shouldn't be an automatic 35yd spot foul. Make PI a 10 yard penalty, no auto first down and move on. Sure they won't get it right all the time, but it would reduce the impact of a single play like a 60 yard hail mary at the end of halftime or the 4th hoping for a PI call. 

Yeah but that also doesn't happen often. It was a clear miss but you don't fuging throw out all logic because one officiating crew completely boned that up. I'd be fuming too, same as I was after our SB and Cam getting shelled while the refs sat on their flags. Did I come in here crying that all roughing calls needed to be reviewed? No. 

Don't pander to some whiny fans in NO over a big blunder. Punish the officials involved accordingly and move on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, stbugs said:

The Hail Mary will be seen far more often now even before halftime. Why not just take a shot? Worst case is nothing. Best case has improved a ton because there’s always some sort of pushing on that play and if you get the review you’ll get a TD shot or a FG. Heck, you could be at your 10 yard line and have a chance at a long FG or a second Hail Mary with a penalty and a free down if time expires. 

I an see Belichik doing this (100% successful) or Sean Payton (60% successful) or Pete Carroll (50% successful) or the Jets (not successful lol).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Darrell Jackson would be a fantastic pickup for us, I think he could replace 80% of what A’Shawn gave us last year. With more passing rush upside going forward in the future, I’m a big proponent of large framed defensive tackles. Pairing Derrick Brown with another 6’5 35inch arm length DT would be so fun to watch. Let’s continue being huge in the middle, allow our linebackers to flow to the ball uninterrupted.
    • Fully agree that the best thing to do is ignore them, which takes a away their thrill of thinking they got to you.
    • I agree with you on the pick of Thienemen in the first. I think he will still be there and he's a smart, fast and sturdy player. He's who we need back there. In the second, I like Rodriguez over Golday. I agree that off the ball linebackers are desperately needed here, even with our great FA pick up. I think with our third pick, we're going to dip into OT territory instead of the D-line. While I agree that we need another disruptor at the point of attack that is stout enough to just stonewall a center and a guard at the same time, we've got a shaky and expensive O-line at the present that is just about to age out of the game. I think we snag Blake Miller out of Clemson here and give him a year behind Moton to learn and put some weight and strength on. He can also jump right in and play right guard at any time. Also, and this might sound crazy, but anyone who has put up with multiple seasons at Clemson will be able to take the heat and humidity of training camp at the start of the season and early games against the NFCSouth.  Beyond that, your guess is as good as mine. We do need that QB for competition and realistically to study for back-up. Luke Altmyer out of Illinois seems to fit the mold of the point guard type QB that they want from Bryce. That'd make an apples to apples situation that could make coaching and game planning easy. On the other hand North Dakota State's Cole Payton could be an intriguing choice as well as a big dual threat guy. Both could be there for our fourth pick or both could be gone. Will QBs continue to slide this season like last? Who knows? 
×
×
  • Create New...