Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

(pre) Rank the 2019 NFC teams in 4 tiers


Lumps

Recommended Posts

Little bored. So how would you guys rank the NFC this year?

I’d say:

Tier 1: Rams, Saints and Bears

2: Seahawks, Eagles, Cowboys

3: Panthers , Vikings, Falcons, Packers, Redskins

4: Giants, 49ers, Lions, Cardinals, Buccs

I think the Packers, 49ers and Cardinals can be the big surprises/wildcards as well as the Panthers. They all have a lot of unknowns that could be great or very bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

Sooooo much kool aid.

Dakota Prescott didnt get across midfield till the 3rd quarter against us and we were a missed field goal away from being Seattle even with a one armed Cam. Ive been pessimistic about this team ever since Super Bowl 50 but I swear if Cam is healthy ill take our roster over anyone in the league no BS. Still wish we would get a damn safety though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright list going into the season.  Probably on par with what a lot of predictions will be.  

Of course, most people thought the Bears were a 4-6 win team last year, so inevitably there will be surprises.

I would swap the 49ers and the Redskins.  If Garrapolo is healthy, the Niners have a pretty solid roster.  The Redskins have a good defense on paper but the uncertainty with Haskins being a rookie, the LT sitting out, not great WR would concern me.

I think any of the Tier 3 and up teams can make the playoffs, and it's not out of the realm of possibility a Tier 4 team will.  It's what makes the NFL fun.  There will probably be a Tier 1 or Tier 2 team that falls hard, too.  The Bears would have been a Tier 4 team going into last year.  I think they are the most likely Tier 1 team to drastically decrease from last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, saX man said:

Rams are going to SUCK.

1: Panthers-Bears-Vikings-Saints

2: Eagles-Falcons-Packers-Cowboys-Seahawks

I agree. I think they may have a Super Bowl hangover and it will be the 3rd year of having tape on their Head Coach. Hopefully we get that win game 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tier 1(Proven entities that SHOULDN'T have a drop off from being elite): Rams, Saints

Tier 2(Could ascend to elite, could be mediocre): Panthers, Bears, Packers, Vikings, Eagles, Cowboys, Seahawks, Falcons

Tier 3(Mediocre to bad): 49ers, Cardinals, Bucs, Lions, Redskins, Giants, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Lumps said:

Little bored. So how would you guys rank the NFC this year?

I’d say:

Tier 1: Rams, Saints and Bears

2: Seahawks, Eagles, Cowboys

3: Panthers , Vikings, Falcons, Packers, Redskins

4: Giants, 49ers, Lions, Cardinals, Buccs

I think the Packers, 49ers and Cardinals can be the big surprises/wildcards as well as the Panthers. They all have a lot of unknowns that could be great or very bad.

Tier 1: Rams, Saints, Bears and Panthers

2: Seahawks, Eagles, Vikings and Falcons

3: Packers, Cowboys, Redskins and Lions

4: Giants, 49ers, Cardinals and  Bucs

If this was a "place" finish, then I'd obviously have to move some things around.  I totally think the Panthers will be on par (equal tier) with the Saints this year.  It's going to be a couple deciding factors that determines who actually finishes first and second in the NFCS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...