Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DeAngelo Williams Hating on Cam Newton


The Huddler

Recommended Posts

Lol

Switch Cam with any QB in this league...put them behind our previous line, previous OC, previous receivers and also give them the benefit of the headshot no call treatment and see how they fair for 9 seasons.

With a live arm Cam is top 10 QB no question.

And just to mention...The last two times we made it to the post season. .

2015 ...15-1 ..  Throwing to Philly Brown and Ted Ginn....

2017 11-5...Throwing to Funchess, Bersin and Klay.... 

That's all you need to know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stirs said:

Homers will Homer.

Cam is our QB and we hope he "balls" as SAS said.

But, you can't deny some of the stats, no matter who brought them up.  Outside of Carolina, how many fans would want to trade their QB for Cam straight up?  Tampa, yes.  But they would say that to about 30 other teams.

Here's hoping that Cam has the season and shoulder, that we are all hoping for.  But you cannot with a straight face deny that Cam has had his ups and downs.

The ONLY reason any team would think twice about trading for him is his injured shoulder. No one doubts his potential when healthy. Pat Mahomes, and of course the other HoF QBs aside most teams would love to have him. He had Steve Smith briefly and then KB (FA no one wants), Funchess (who we let walk), Philly Brown (don’t know if he is still in this league) had to become his top targets. Oh and imagine throwing to these guys (who can’t get separation) with no LT to protect your blind side. I don’t think any other QB could have got that roster to the Super Bowl in 2015. He has 17 game winning drives in 9 seasons. That over a 16 game season’s worth of game winning drives with little help on offense. If you are watching a Panthers game there is an 11% chance Cam is going to have the game winning drive that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam is great...he has gone through stretches periodically where he hasnt shown up. I dont think anyone can deny that when good Cam shows up hes unstoppable and the most dynamic athlete at that position in history. He just needs a good season where he can bring his A game week in and week out.

They can say hes only had 3 winning seasons. But he has been to the playoffs 4 times and won the division 3 years in a row.

The biggest issue last season was his shoulder...not his ability. That's more of a concern. A healthy Cam is one of the most if not the most dynamic playmaker in history...but will he stay healthy?  That's more of a legitimate argument.  We all know theres a big bullseye on that right shoulder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

The ONLY reason any team would think twice about trading for him is his injured shoulder. No one doubts his potential when healthy. Pat Mahomes, and of course the other HoF QBs aside most teams would love to have him. He had Steve Smith briefly and then KB (FA no one wants), Funchess (who we let walk), Philly Brown (don’t know if he is still in this league) had to become his top targets. Oh and imagine throwing to these guys (who can’t get separation) with no LT to protect your blind side. I don’t think any other QB could have got that roster to the Super Bowl in 2015. He has 17 game winning drives in 9 seasons. That over a 16 game season’s worth of game winning drives with little help on offense. If you are watching a Panthers game there is an 11% chance Cam is going to have the game winning drive that game.

Dallas, Philly, NYG - no     Washington might be your only taker but they just drafted their future?

We already discussed the NFC South with Tampa being the only yes.

Chicago, GB, Detroit- no   Minny might

Seattle, LA, San Fran and AZ, all no

NE, Buffalo - no   Miami and Jets might be interested

Pitt, Cleveland and Baltimore -no    Cincy might

Texas, Tennessee and Jax  - no   Indy might, but who in the right mind in Carolina would want the Geico caveman

Denver, KC, San Diego - no  Oakland, who knows what Gruden might do.

 

 

I count maybe 25% of the league willing to switch.  Take off Homer glasses and pretend you live in Nebraska or something for a few mins.  Everyone thinks their kid is the cutest in the class, but for outsiders, meh

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stirs said:

Dallas, Philly, NYG - no     Washington might be your only taker but they just drafted their future?

We already discussed the NFC South with Tampa being the only yes.

Chicago, GB, Detroit- no   Minny might

Seattle, LA, San Fran and AZ, all no

NE, Buffalo - no   Miami and Jets might be interested

Pitt, Cleveland and Baltimore -no    Cincy might

Texas, Tennessee and Jax  - no   Indy might, but who in the right mind in Carolina would want the Geico caveman

Denver, KC, San Diego - no  Oakland, who knows what Gruden might do.

 

 

I count maybe 25% of the league willing to switch.  Take off Homer glasses and pretend you live in Nebraska or something for a few mins.  Everyone thinks their kid is the cutest in the class, but for outsiders, meh

 

 

just because you say “no” doesn’t make it true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

just because you say “no” doesn’t make it true.

In a vacuum you are freaking joking if you think that Buffalo and San Francisco wouldn't trade Josh Allen or Jimmy Garoppolo for Cam.

The thing is though we live in the real world where there are jobs and egos on the line.  SF paid dearly for Garoppolo and Allen is considered the future of the Bills.  If either of those FOs cut and ran like that they'd look stupid as poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
×
×
  • Create New...