Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Donte is a BALL HAWK


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

The great part is he is still growing. He is very good and has all the talent to become an all pro as he continues to develop. Even with a few missed tackles and one play where he abandoned his assignment, he had twice as many insane plays that overshadowed it. I cannot wait to see what the future holds for him. Jackson and Bradberry is a tandem I hope we keep for a long time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he will get lots of opportunities to make big plays.  Next week especially.   Watson is a home run/big play QB

He is still very inconsistent.  He defiantly took advantage of two bad throws.  Which is great.   But you gotta think opposing team see him as they guy they can get over Bradberry. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

He may be a ballhawk, but it when it comes to tackling he's a parakeet.

The entire secondary could use a reminder or two on the fundamentals of wrapping up and tackling.  I think Reid is pretending to be a bumper car half the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ballhawk yes, but probably the worst tackler on the defense.  I cringe when Donte has to make an open field tackle because more time than not, he's gonna miss it.  Besides the high-thrown smoke screen pass where the WR was a sitting duck and Donte tattooed him, he tackled horribly today.  Two picks will gloss that fact over though.  I'm not sure which is worse a corner with hands of stone or a ballhawking CB that gets brushed aside by the opposing ball carriers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Ballhawk yes, but probably the worst tackler on the defense.  I cringe when Donte has to make an open field tackle because more time than not, he's gonna miss it.  Besides the high-thrown smoke screen pass where the WR was a sitting duck and Donte tattooed him, he tackled horribly today.  Two picks will gloss that fact over though.  I'm not sure which is worse a corner with hands of stone or a ballhawking CB that gets brushed aside by the opposing ball carries.

You want a corner that can make picks. Hands down. Deion Sanders couldn't tackle a Pop Warner kid, but you weren't throwing at him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jopie87 said:

You want a corner that can make picks. Hands down. Deion Sanders couldn't tackle a Pop Warner kid, but you weren't throwing at him. 

No, but you can run at him. That, or drop a pass short in front of him and gamble on the receiver breaking his attempt at a tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Per Adam Schefter: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1920523706624823739 Expected, but just want to rub it in here.
    • I try to keep up and project the roster with color-coded charts.  You can see priorities and gauge who has the best chance of making the roster--you can see the priorities as well.  Here, Yellow is a 2025 draft pick, green is an undrafted free agent, and orange is a free agent. The depth chart will obviously change and I am not sure about roles (positions in all cases), so that is not the real issue at this time, but yellows and oranges show how the team focused on which aspects of the defense:     In the front 5, there were 3 draft picks, 3 free agents (not including players we re-signed), and two undrafted players signed. In the back 6, there was 1 draft pick and 2 free agents (LB, S), and four undrafted free agents. The undrafted free agents are always long shots, but by identifying them, you can tell which longshots might make the roster.
    • The rise of analytics in sports goes back to the use of sabermetrics in baseball.  The ironic thing is that the whole point of Bill James work was to objectively figure out each players contribution to to a team's wins throughout the season.  This is possible in baseball because each at bat is essentially a 1v1 with an objective outcome.  Applying statistical averages also works a lot better with hundreds of plate appearances over 162 games a year. PFF grades plays subjectively, and then puts them into buckets.  They then create different statistics based on those buckets.  That's all well and good and I'm not saying it's useless.  But calling it analytics like it's some kind of objective science is a far cry from what is actually going on.
×
×
  • Create New...