Turner returning?

[DaveThePanther2008]

Unless Turner's ankle injury is severe I would assume he would return for the SF game.  Also Little hopefully comes out of concussion protocol and be available as well.

With Daley playing well do we keep him at LT or put Little (our 2nd round investment) back in at LT?

With a healthy O-line we have options.  What would be the optimal O-line heading into the SF game.  SF front 4 is pretty stout.

 

 

[07579394]

Bye week,bro.We will see next Wed

[Dex]

ReTurning. 

[Mr. Scot]

Haven't seen anything on it...

[bandu]

1 hour ago, GreensboroPirate said:

Dennis Daley is better than Little and it will be a shame if we move him to guard simply because he was chosen in the 6th round.

Draft status is a sunk cost, and we should keep Daley at left tackle

the primary objective for an oL is to field your top 5 oL and keep them there in that same position throughout the year unless of course an injury arises. & what this does is create a sense of familiarity with  one another so they are collectively playing in tandem or let's say as a unit..now here's we currently stand taken into consideration Daleys recent performance on the field  & that is choosing which one of our starters to replace in either Van Roten at LG or Little at LT.so moreover the decision is not who's better Daley or Little but. instead who is better Van Roten or Little? 

 

 

[ForJimmy]

I think you leave Van Roten in for now because of experience. He helps call out blitzes and coach up Little or Daley. I would roll with Daley, Roten, Paradis, Turner, and Moton. Have Little ready to come in for Daley if he struggles or gets hurt with Williams backing up the right side. Plus it would be good for Little to get extra rest from those concussions...  Daley and Little on the left should be our long term plan though. With Larsen having experience, we have solid depth on the o-line finally. Hopefully with continue to develop and draft defensive and offensive linemen.

[Snake]

Turner has never been a quick healer. 

[DaveThePanther2008]

13 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Haven't seen anything on it...

Kind of surprised we haven't heard a word.

[BIGH2001]

Out for the year.  We signed Amini to start Vs SF

[bandu]

1 hour ago, BIGH2001 said:

Out for the year.  We signed Amini to start Vs SF

excuse mE but the only wE in this type of nonsense is that Hurney is smoking some uwEEE hEE hEE i can't sEE the forest for the trEE

[ncfan]

BuT wE'rE 4-0 wItHoUt HiM

aNd WiLliAms HaS lOoKeD gOoD aT rG

[pantherclaw]

Van Roten has been playing well. And a leader. 

Good luck convincing any coaching staff he needs to be replaced.  

[1of10Charnatives]

9 hours ago, bandu said:

excuse mE but the only wE in this type of nonsense is that Hurney is smoking some uwEEE hEE hEE i can't sEE the forest for the trEE

 

26 minutes ago, ncfan said:

BuT wE'rE 4-0 wItHoUt HiM

aNd WiLliAms HaS lOoKeD gOoD aT rG

*grabs bandu and ncfan's keyboards and chucks them both out the window since they are clearly defective and their effed up typing hurts his eyes.*

Better.

Carry on.

[Peon Awesome]

Isn't it amazing how everyone on this forum after week 2 was clamoring for us to invest a ton of resources to upgrade our line, either devoting most of the next draft, trading for Trent Williams, etc, etc, while complaining that the organization has consistently failed to address the line for years and Matsko has lost his touch. Now suddenly, with all the same players, we're openly debating which of our well-performing linemen we're going to have to relegate to the bench. Goes to show we could probably stand to dial back our reactionary tendencies a touch and show some patience, right guys?