Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers fun fact. Their opponents this season have a combined W/L record of 10-28


PanthersNC1984

Recommended Posts

Do with that info what you will but the bottom line?! They haven’t played a single team with a winning record this season. Grant it most of our opponents have been losers as well BUT we did beat a legit Texans team on their turf. So that’s something to go on atleast.

The 49ers have literally had the easiest schedule so far this season out of the entire league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PanthersNC1984 said:

Do with that info what you will but the bottom line?! They haven’t played a single team with a winning record this season. Grant it most of our opponents have been losers as well BUT we did beat a legit Texans team on their turf. So that’s something to go on atleast.

The 49ers have literally had the easiest schedule so far this season out of the entire league.

Second easiest. See above

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminds me of when people called us the “worst 6-0 team of all time” en route to 15-1 and a SB appearance.  All that matters is wins and losses.  They’re a good team and it won’t be easy, but I know we can win this weekend.  I wanna see Mac Daddy run laps around those fools

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People say that but they said the same about us.

i think people didn’t really believe until we blew out Seattle and Arizona in the playoffs(yeh Seattle was catching up but that’s more of the prevent crap Ron pulled than the team).

i believe we will beat Frisco— but then again they could be for real.

i won’t believe that until they go to the playoffs and take down Green Bay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of y'all need to flashback to 2015 when the national narrative was that the Panthers hadn't played anyone worth a damn.  Undefeated is undefeated, each team has superstars, pro bowlers and potentially future HOFs.  Each weak you still have to execute the game plan, line up and smash the other team in the mouth while doing your job. You can't ask for respect if you're not willing to give it.  I say congrats, but come Sunday ---- game on and Keep £ing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

Some of y'all need to flashback to 2015 when the national narrative was that the Panthers hadn't played anyone worth a damn.  Undefeated is undefeated, each team has superstars, pro bowlers and potentially future HOFs.  Each weak you still have to execute the game plan, line up and smash the other team in the mouth while doing your job. You can't ask for respect if you're not willing to give it.  I say congrats, but come Sunday ---- game on and Keep £ing.

Only difference was we did play good teams. We even beat Seattle in Seattle when they were undefeated there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of it means anything. Teams don't get to pick and choose the difficulty of their opponents on a week-to-week basis. It simply means they have beaten the team that has showed up on the other side of the field each week.

Sagarin ratings have the 49ers facing the 27th toughest schedule. That means, out of 32 team's schedules, theirs ranks 27th. The Panthers have the 21st. And yeah, the Patriots opponents are ranked 32nd. So, it's not as though the Panthers have played much of a better schedule.

Also according to Sagarin, the 49ers, ranked 2nd overall, are essentially favored by 3 over the Panthers who are ranked 8th.

https://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/sagarin/ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...