Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers fun fact. Their opponents this season have a combined W/L record of 10-28

PanthersNC1984

By PanthersNC1984,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

PanthersNC1984 Newbie

PanthersNC1984

Posted
Posted

Do with that info what you will but the bottom line?! They haven’t played a single team with a winning record this season. Grant it most of our opponents have been losers as well BUT we did beat a legit Texans team on their turf. So that’s something to go on atleast.

The 49ers have literally had the easiest schedule so far this season out of the entire league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, PanthersNC1984 said:

Do with that info what you will but the bottom line?! They haven’t played a single team with a winning record this season. Grant it most of our opponents have been losers as well BUT we did beat a legit Texans team on their turf. So that’s something to go on atleast.

The 49ers have literally had the easiest schedule so far this season out of the entire league.

Second easiest. See above

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaMan Mentor

PandaMan

Posted
Posted

Reminds me of when people called us the “worst 6-0 team of all time” en route to 15-1 and a SB appearance.  All that matters is wins and losses.  They’re a good team and it won’t be easy, but I know we can win this weekend.  I wanna see Mac Daddy run laps around those fools

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted

People say that but they said the same about us.

i think people didn’t really believe until we blew out Seattle and Arizona in the playoffs(yeh Seattle was catching up but that’s more of the prevent crap Ron pulled than the team).

i believe we will beat Frisco— but then again they could be for real.

i won’t believe that until they go to the playoffs and take down Green Bay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown on 1 Experienced

X-Clown on 1

Posted
Posted

Some of y'all need to flashback to 2015 when the national narrative was that the Panthers hadn't played anyone worth a damn.  Undefeated is undefeated, each team has superstars, pro bowlers and potentially future HOFs.  Each weak you still have to execute the game plan, line up and smash the other team in the mouth while doing your job. You can't ask for respect if you're not willing to give it.  I say congrats, but come Sunday ---- game on and Keep £ing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

Some of y'all need to flashback to 2015 when the national narrative was that the Panthers hadn't played anyone worth a damn.  Undefeated is undefeated, each team has superstars, pro bowlers and potentially future HOFs.  Each weak you still have to execute the game plan, line up and smash the other team in the mouth while doing your job. You can't ask for respect if you're not willing to give it.  I say congrats, but come Sunday ---- game on and Keep £ing.

Only difference was we did play good teams. We even beat Seattle in Seattle when they were undefeated there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raleigh PF Rising Star

Raleigh PF

Posted
Posted

None of it means anything. Teams don't get to pick and choose the difficulty of their opponents on a week-to-week basis. It simply means they have beaten the team that has showed up on the other side of the field each week.

Sagarin ratings have the 49ers facing the 27th toughest schedule. That means, out of 32 team's schedules, theirs ranks 27th. The Panthers have the 21st. And yeah, the Patriots opponents are ranked 32nd. So, it's not as though the Panthers have played much of a better schedule.

Also according to Sagarin, the 49ers, ranked 2nd overall, are essentially favored by 3 over the Panthers who are ranked 8th.

https://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/sagarin/ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By csx · Posted

      Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • kungfoodude
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • Tr3ach
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By Tr3ach · Posted

      I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...