Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is this the biggest game of the past couple of seasons?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

No and here is why. The year was 2013, a scrappy, underdog Panthers team went into San Fran and beat a very good Harbaugh 49ers team.

Playoff time comes and it’s a rematch,  San Fran beats us and makes it to the NFCCG that year.

My point- I’m not reading much into this game at all because we could easily be the 2013 49ers in this situation. Besides, it’s very hard to beat a team twice in a row, so it could end up being a silver lining if we lose this one and have a rematch in the playoffs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its honestly hard to believe we have a game as important as this one.  part of me is waiting for the house of cards to crumble, and another part sees we have a really good team with a young kid with seemingly a lot of potential learning how to play qb in actual games.   if we can pull out a W i think our confidence is gonna go thru the roof.   i hate i have to wait until 4pm.  just makes the sunday nerves last an extra 3 hours.  maybe it won't rain and i can split some wood or catch up on some chainsawing i need to deal with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KB_fan said:

 

It does have a lot of echoes of last year at Pittsburgh too. So, while I want a W, above all I just desperately hope for a respectable close game and no serious injuries.

This was in my mind, too. Get a win, and get out unhurt.. This game feels like one of those hinge points upon which a season turns. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I think it’s getting extra hype from us because we’ve had two weeks to stew and we are just on the other side of the playoff window.  
 

that said I still think it’s big. 

Well said. You're probably right on both counts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we win, it's big in it being a confidence booster. If we lose, it's just another loss.

Last year's Steelers game was big in the demoralizing effect it had on the team and fans. It was also big in the way it affected Cam. That moment, that hit... I think it changed the dynamic of this team in a really bad way, probably worse than the back to back losses to the broncos and refs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We actually have an elite defense this year, not one held together by tape and chewing gum where Captain Munnerlyn was sometimes a starter. I don’t think a drubbing like the one the Steelers gave us will happen again during Rivera’s tenure. I think if we lose, it’ll be close. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...