Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What QB does Kyle Allen remind you of?


electro's horse

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, SmartyHurney said:

This is what I mean by obtuse. You're looking at something that has nothing to do with my original statement to prove I'm wrong. Pre-snap motion is almost always going to happen, unless the play is changed and there's too little time. What they're doing with Kyle is having lots of a pre-snap motion, more than the average team to help disguise the primary target. Why? Because it's pretty much the only read Kyle is making. It's not that complicated, you can check my post history I stated this a week ago as well. They're doing so much pre-snap to help Allen. Allen is not commanding anything, or changing anything, he's either handing it off or hitting his first read / the checkdown.

and yet we are winning games with Allen.  6-1. 

I mean if only he was calling audibles!  3-4 would be better with him changing plays!

go watch tell me how impressive Danny Dimes is pre-snap.  

Your bar for Allen make no sense.  You are setting bar as if he is a year 2-3 player.  He is a 23 year old green backup.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SmartyHurney said:

Literally has never happened. What we're doing with Kyle is running a vanilla offense with a lot of pre-snap motion. That has nothing to do with Kyle, that's how the play is designed. We're asking everyone on the offense to make it easier for Kyle.

You're being obtuse.

Your intimation is that we are dumbing it down for Kyle and that is holding back the offense and I would disagree. We are using more max protections, rolling Kyle out, and using motion in order to help Kyle figure out the defense because he is not Cam and needs the different gameplanning in order to be most effective. When you change from Cam of course there is going to need  to be changes in gameplanning. Let's be real here, there are no athletes like Cam at quarterback. What we are doing is gameplanning their defense and everyone on offense has to do their part and make plays for us to succeed. Norv knows what Allen does best and what the defense will give us. So we do the best we can with what we have and hope it is enough. Kyle can run all the plays, he just won't be Cam doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He reminds me of early Jake. Unknown without a great track record. Coming in without great skills or athleticism just doing the best he can to win some games. I hope that DJ  and Samuel can both do their best Smitty imitations. I figure it will take two good receivers to fill Smitty's shoes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

Kyle is absolutely a one read quarterback. If it's not there, he checks down to cmc. He locks on to receivers from the snap

I disagree, yes he has locked down from time to time.  But maybe he feels he doesn't have the time to make his reads, feels the pressure coming and checks down to CMC which is a very good option to move the chains.  I can remember many a times screaming at Cam to check it down to wide open CMC but instead he keeps reading for that long open pass that just wasn't there and then starts to scramble to avoid a sack, but we all saw.....he just kept taking those hits over and over.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kyle has always looked like Andy Dalton to me.  Not current Andy Dalton but the one in his first 3 or 4 years in the league when the Bengals had all kinds of talent on the OL and good recievers.  He will look good when the talent around him is good, but when the talent around him is not good he won't look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, electro's horse said:

ding ding. 

body makeup, throw, everything. i think Ryan is a little taller, throws over the top a little better, but Kyle looks exactly like Ryan did about halfway through his second season. Remember, for the first year and a half, Ryan just handed the ball off to Turner or threw PA outs to Roddy White. It took him a few years to learn how to read difference and find the holes in coverages. 

Allen is already starting to do that. 

Ryan has never had the biggest arm in the league, but he's still learned to be one of the most prolific passers just by understanding coverages and knowing where his receivers are going to be. 

This is a pretty concise take on it. I think you're spot on.

And learning to read and react to defenses is a huge part of being a successful NFL QB. No amount of arm strength or mobility can overcome a lack of understanding. Give the Kid some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...