Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport: Rivera the hottest coaching candidate


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Of course he is.  Which is why if Tepper doesn't hit a home run with the next hire he's going to look like a reactionary idiot.  Especially if his judgement was based on a season in which we were essentially starting a rookie QB and had more than half of our lines go down with injury.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera is basically a Garrett clone in almost every category aside the fact he has made it to the big stage. which I suppose is a big one and a new environment could bring out the best in Ron. He’s got to learn to think outside that box though.

I think he’s a great choice for the few  teams stuck in a shithole the past 5+ years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yeah, of course he is. He guided a 2-14 team to three consecutive division titles and a conference championship within five years and has a .546 winning percentage. Contrary to what some couch general managers here think, he’s widely respected throughout the league and gets along well with players. Most teams, especially those with openings, would see it as a clear upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He can be a good coach but it was time to move on. He didn’t produce results and it was best for the organization and him to have a fresh start. Eventually the same message year after year wears off on vets and the results never improved, even in his “area of strength”. Our defense is absolutely terrible, with enough talent to compete, and the results cannot be blamed on Cam being hurt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean John Fox got hired and made it to a SB, it’s no surprise he’s getting another HC job.

 

Doesn't mean it’s the right decision. Fox, Fisher, Lewis and Rivera are essentially the same coach. All antiquated, old school, defense first, bad adjusting, terrible game and clock managing conservative coaches. 
 

God bless the team that hires him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A barely over .500 career coach who only produced three winning seasons in nine years is the hottest candidate on the market?

Damn, this market sucks.

I think fans get so focused on their own bubble they sometimes don't see the big picture happening elsewhere.

I mean the majority of franchises have been worse.  Ron did things here....most franchises haven't' done in the same window. 

Ron brought home multiple division titles in a tough division, a conference title, an all time historic season, and Super Bowl appearance.  How many teams did better than that since 2011.  Yeah, we can name several.  But most franchisees didn't see that success and some are comically not even close. 

Belichicks are near impossible to find.  But Ron Rivera types are also not easy to find. Most teams are looking for one because they have had worse.  Only ones that don't want a Ron Rivera type are ones that just had one.  

Ron would be a great hire for most teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think fans get so focused on their own bubble they sometimes don't see the big picture happening elsewhere.

I mean the majority of franchises have been worse.  Ron did things here....most franchises haven't' done in the same window. 

Ron brought home multiple division titles in a tough division, a conference title, an all time historic season, and Super Bowl appearance.  How many teams did better than that since 2011.  Yeah, we can name several.  But most franchisees didn't see that success and some are comically not even close. 

Belichicks are near impossible to find.  But Ron Rivera types are also not easy to find. Most teams are looking for one because they have had worse.  Only ones that don't want a Ron Rivera type are ones that just had one.  

Ron would be a great hire for most teams. 

Would you be happy if we hire Jason Garrett when Jerry Jones fires him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...