Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ Moore is #3 in the NFL in receiving yards at 22 years old


bobowilson

Recommended Posts

https://www.espn.com/nfl/stats/player/_/stat/receiving/table/receiving/sort/receivingYards/dir/desc

He's also likely to break Larry Fitzgerald's record for receiving yards before the age of 23, despite the fact he got limited snaps in the first half of his rookie year.    So that would make him, statistically, the most dominant young wide receiver in NFL history (a record that has stood for 15 years despite how pass happy the league has gotten).

Now consider the fact he's been able to do this catching passes from Kyle Allen (and an injured Cam Newton who couldn't throw deep).  In addition, he's on a team with a terrible pass blocking line, which limits the time the QB has to throw deep.  He would very likely be leading the NFL in receiving yards if he was in the Saints offense, and he's 22 years old.

Raw yardage aside, PFF has him graded as elite, he's one of the most efficient WRs in the NFL in various analytic measures, and has the 6th lowest drop rate in the NFL out of qualified wide outs.

I understand people are despondent over this season, but it's looking like we might have what will turn out to be the best wide receiver in the NFL in years to come (given he's already third at only 22).

If he stays healthy, he will likely shatter Steve Smith's team records.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

And yet there are tons of Huddle idiots that still think Curtis Samuel is better.

Or that he's somehow not a "true #1 wide receiver", despite the fact he's having the most statistically dominant years for any wide receiver of his age in NFL history.

I see comments about how Kyle Allen has 'no good receivers to throw to".

I'm not sure what it is about Moore's playing style that causes people to underrate him to the degree they do;  I think people are stuck in another decade where your WR1 needed to be 6'4.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

WTF happened?

Well it's pretty simple.

Kyle Allen has the 3rd worst passer rating in the NFL, 2nd worst QBR, rated dead last of any starting QB by PFF

When your starting quarterback is performing at a historically bad level, you're going to lose a ton of games.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean no doubt am I excited about DJ’s growth and performance but to say he’ll smash Smittys records is still a stretch. I mean even the eye test still says DJ isn’t as unreal or as fast as Smith was. Or maybe Steve just looks faster because he’s shorter. But DJ looks great out there. Hopefully the #1 we’ve been looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

I'm not sure what it is about Moore's playing style that causes people to underrate him to the degree they do

He's very quiet. Doesn't talk a lot. Not all about the drip. Doesn't do flashy celebrations. (Oh, And he hasn't had many TDs relative to his yards..., so not on a lot of highlight reels)

Probably not a bad thing for such a young kid. Earn the right to be vocal and swaggy through your play.

DJ has really impressed me. Excited about his future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DJ's definitely bucked up over the span of this season. To start with he was as soft as Curtis out there. He's toughened up noticeably, and he's turned into what Smitty saw in him.

He needs to keep it up. I still question his ball security at times, but he's done a lot of good work at becoming more consistent and playing tough.

I won't crown him as anything compared to Smitty right now, but if he keeps it up he could be one of the great ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...