Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns was top 5 in the NFL in sacks per snap, and led all rookies


bobowilson

Recommended Posts

For comparison

Brian Burns - 7.5 sacks in only 447 snaps

Nick Bosa -   9.0 sacks in 716 snaps

As heralded as Bosa was, Burns had nearly the same amount of sacks despite playing in half the snaps.  This might be a bit of an obscure stat, but it shows what a completely dominant pass rusher he was, even as a rookie battling through injuries, in getting to the quarterback.  Rookie defensive ends tend to struggle, as it's one of the most difficult positions to make an impact early on.   If he had been healthy this year, his numbers would have been even better.

There's concerns about his ability to play the run, but he's an extremely high character, motivated young man who will do everything he can to bulk up and adjust to the position.  In addition, this is becoming more and more of a passing league every year, and it's extraordinarily hard to find guys who can consistently create pressure at this level.  Brian Burns upside is tremendous, and the concerns about him remind me of the grumblings over DJ Moore not getting more snaps as a rookie.

I think we will see 20 sack seasons out of Burns in his prime (not that hard to project when he would have had 15+ as a rookie if he played starter minutes).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

And for him to stay healthy.

Ya, too bad he broke his hand doing a dumb, tried to play and made it worse. I really honestly think he fractured his fingers trying to block that punt though and broke more getting angry. 

His stats were half that, half Bruce Irvin. 

@KB_fan @kungfoodude or someone smarter about statistics then I am. I would love to see his stats in the run game and drop back though. 

When ever his name comes up it seems pretty one dimensional. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Ya, too bad he broke his hand doing a dumb, tried to play and made it worse. I really honestly think he fractured his fingers trying to block that punt though and broke more getting angry. 

His stats were half that, half Bruce Irvin. 

@KB_fan @kungfoodude or someone smarter about statistics then I am. I would love to see his stats in the run game and drop back though. 

When ever his name comes up it seems pretty one dimensional. 

A lot of those situational individual statistics are behind paywalls, unfortunately. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...