Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The case for drafting a DT (Brown) at #7


MHS831

Recommended Posts

The case for adding a DT at #7 is a reaction to Raleigh's "The case for adding a LT".  Not my opinion, but an exercise in exploring all options and making a case for each need position.

The only DT I would take in the first round is Brown (Aub).  He can play NT, the 3, or 5 tech.  With KK hitting age 30 and Poe at 31, who do we have on the depth chart?  Sure, you can bring McCoy back and overpay an aging shell of what he used to be (see his 2019 stats) and you can pretend Kyle Love will have juice at age 34--or you can face the reality of the situation:  We have nothing beyond an underperforming, overpriced Short and we want Poe to start "nevermore." 

Some argue, "Sure you are right, but what about OT?"  Greg Little had first round measurables but dropped to the second round because he was raw.  He missed most of camp and played a few games before going to IR.  We have a high draft pick at LT.  We have Daley too.  At DT, we have NOTHING.  Did you not see teams average 5-8 yards per carry against us this year?  Develop the RAW LT with first round ability and do not give up on him because he had a concussion or two and missed key development before being thrown to the sharks.  If you judge him on that, you are being impulsive.  You need to let Matsko work on his balance and footwork.  Address Center and LG, but if you check the roster, we have ZERO at DT except some 30 something underperforming, overpaid fat guys.

Next:  "The case for drafting a CB at #7"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he has a high enough grade, I like DT better than OT honestly.  As much as our O line needs help, what we really need is a G and I just don't think you take a G in the top 10.  Sure, we need a C, but I can't see us spending a top 10 pick on a C either.

If the guy has the potential to be the next KK / Star . . . yea, you take him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brown is a great  defensive player, there is no question   He may be generational but today’s NFL favors the offense 

however generational he may be,  we cannot win with QBs on their backs or injured reserve  and finding LTs are much harder than finding a guard or center, both of which also need an upgrade but can be found In rds 2 and 3 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of all the holes (and there are several big ones) the lack of a stud 3-4 DE who can hold down the run while pass rushing is dire. I think we ca. Find an NT later in the draft. We literally have no one there who is on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Leatherwood staying at AL this may push the other Oline prospects up a bit more (Wirfs) so I would be good with Brown at 7. Saw him play a lot and he was a high motor beast all year  - I still think Wirfs should be the guy pending the Combine but I wouldnt be upset if we drafted Brown though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BrianS said:

If he has a high enough grade, I like DT better than OT honestly.  As much as our O line needs help, what we really need is a G and I just don't think you take a G in the top 10.  Sure, we need a C, but I can't see us spending a top 10 pick on a C either.

If the guy has the potential to be the next KK / Star . . . yea, you take him.

You must not have watched the 2019 season. We need a bunch more than a Guard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, manu4t said:

With Leatherwood staying at AL this may push the other Oline prospects up a bit more (Wirfs) so I would be good with Brown at 7. Saw him play a lot and he was a high motor beast all year  - I still think Wirfs should be the guy pending the Combine but I wouldnt be upset if we drafted Brown though.

Thomas/Brown/Wirfs, whichever is there (and in that order) for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tiger7_88 said:

Thomas/Brown/Wirfs, whichever is there (and in that order) for me.

All are dire positions of need. The good thing about this draft is we have so many spots on the roster that are problems so unless we draft a K or P first rd we are only getting better with any of these choices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raleigh-panther said:

Brown is a great  defensive player, there is no question   He may be generational but today’s NFL favors the offense 

however generational he may be,  we cannot win with QBs on their backs or injured reserve  and finding LTs are much harder than finding a guard or center, both of which also need an upgrade but can be found In rds 2 and 3 

We also can’t win when our defense consistently gives up over 100 yards a game on the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be ok with the pick as long as there isn’t a stud LT on the board. This draft has very little LT options, we have a guy with two concussions and another guy who showed flashes. Personally I like Daley at LG.
 

Brown is the best option if you go DT, but the draft does have some very good DT’s available 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of Brown and Thomas should be there.  I'll be happy with either one.  I just feel like a franchise LT is much harder to find than a DT, and if you've got the chance, you take it.  Move Little to guard.  Daley is our backup swing tackle.

Then DT in the second.  I recognize the need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...