Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Case for CB at #7 (Okudah)


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Before we start analyzing the player, take a glimpse at the person.  In this link, Jeff Okudah announces that he is entering the draft in a letter to his mother who died of cancer recently.  It is hard to dismiss his character and determination to be great as her son. You see how he values teammates and has a mature concept of moment and opportunity.  This is a guy you want on your team.

https://www.theplayerstribune.com/en-us/articles/jeff-okudah-ohio-state-football

Then there is this:

The need to take the best CB in the draft at #7:  While we are all clamoring for OTs and DTs, there are a few factors that should be considered when you look at the team as a whole.  First, we have a raw LT with first round talent who was not really given a chance to develop this year.  I image the offseason will benefit Little.  Do not draft another one yet.  Secondly, this draft is loaded at DT and free agency will feature a DT or two, and we have some cap room (until Marty spends it all re-signing our own players).

Even if we pay Bradberry to return (I think Marty will give him a great deal to stay), we still do not have an answer on the other side.  Action Jackson needs to change his nickname to Tito--whatever happened to him?  I think he was out of position and would maximize his talent at Nickel.  Cockrell is depth at best.  By adding Okudah to the roster, you get a smart, agressive, long shut down CB who makes both outside CB spots better.   Bradberry no longer gets the #1 WR; he gets the #2.  That makes him better.  Okudah can cover any WR in the NFL right now--today.

We do not realize how bad the CB position was this year for 2 reasons:  We had a ton of sacks/pressure on the QB, minimizing the oppositions ability to pick apart the secondary, and teams could run on us and usually had a lead.  If we can practically shut down the opposition's #1 and #2 WRs, we are going to stay in games longer--and win a few.  While it may not seem like a top need, CB is a huge need.

Of course, if Bradberry walks, we might not have a choice if Okudah is on the board.

Next:  "The case to draft a QB at #7"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we hire a coach with a zone heavy defensive scheme then a CB at #7 almost certainly doesn't make sense.

We honestly can't really know what we need till we see our defensive coach. I absolutely agree taking CB high would be a mistake though if we run a zone scheme. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we hire a coach with a zone heavy defensive scheme then a CB at #7 almost certainly doesn't make sense.

There are some good Zone CBs in this draft later.

About him not being there at #7--he is the only CB I would take, so the argument is over when he is taken.

HOWEVER guys, you could have 2 or even 3 QBs taken in the top 5.  Young is in there too.  Thomas, Wirfs, Brown---I could see Okudah falling to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gone before #7. Wouldn’t mind the pick if we can upgrade the o-line via FA, not many quality OT’s in this draft. Little has already had two concussions, how many more hits can he absorb before he’s Michael Oher?

Not too worried about DT’s, could possibly get Brown and if not there’s a buttload of them in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my view, there are only 2 players who we KNOW will not  be there at #7-Young and Burrow-barring some bad news, they are nearly locks to go 1-2--but we do not know for sure.  There are some players who I think could sneak into the top 7---Both of the prospects from Iowa, for example, could go top 7.  Brown, Thomas, and Jeudy---how could anyone say with certainty that JO will not be there? 

Is this possible?:

1. Burrow (99% sure he is the next Bengal QB)

2. Young (Best player in draft; doubtful defensive coach RR goes another direction)

3. Brown (Lions biggest need is DL, Brown is a versatile, violent DT)

4. Thomas (Giants need a T and he is a hog mollie--Gettlemen gets fired if he does not take Thomas)

5. Tua (The Dolphins and the Chargers #6 need a QB; if Tua comes out, I don''t see him getting past #6--Dolphins will be all in if they do not get Bridgewater, imo)

6. Wirfs or Herbert (The Chargers need QB and OT as their 2 biggest needs at the moment--if the Fish take Tua, I think the Bolts take Wirfs but someone is going to take the Herbert bait)

So you are saying this scenario is not possible? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't hate the pick if he is available.  But, I still think we need a lot more help in the trenches. 

Relying on Little is a gamble because of the injuries.  And, I don't know if we have a handle on just how bad the OL is.  Could one player, for example Little, coming into his own make a big difference, or are we worse than that?

On the DL, we certainly got pressure on opposing QBs.  That was not the problem.  The big issue is one of us would have averaged over 5 yards a carry against our defense, largely because the DL was one-dimensional.  It could rush the passer, but it could not stop the run.  Those are the arguments against Okudah.

The argument I see for him: imagine being able to rush the passer with a shut-down corner on one side, assuming those expectations are realistic for him at the next level.  DCs would be drooling.  And there are some pretty good DTs in this draft, so missing one at #7 does not leave the position unaddressed.

But, it does not matter if the opposition is rushing for 240 yards a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Before we start analyzing the player, take a glimpse at the person.  In this link, Jeff Okudah announces that he is entering the draft in a letter to his mother who died of cancer recently.  It is hard to dismiss his character and determination to be great as her son. You see how he values teammates and has a mature concept of moment and opportunity.  This is a guy you want on your team.

https://www.theplayerstribune.com/en-us/articles/jeff-okudah-ohio-state-football

Then there is this:

The need to take the best CB in the draft at #7:  While we are all clamoring for OTs and DTs, there are a few factors that should be considered when you look at the team as a whole.  First, we have a raw LT with first round talent who was not really given a chance to develop this year.  I image the offseason will benefit Little.  Do not draft another one yet.  Secondly, this draft is loaded at DT and free agency will feature a DT or two, and we have some cap room (until Marty spends it all re-signing our own players).

Even if we pay Bradberry to return (I think Marty will give him a great deal to stay), we still do not have an answer on the other side.  Action Jackson needs to change his nickname to Tito--whatever happened to him?  I think he was out of position and would maximize his talent at Nickel.  Cockrell is depth at best.  By adding Okudah to the roster, you get a smart, agressive, long shut down CB who makes both outside CB spots better.   Bradberry no longer gets the #1 WR; he gets the #2.  That makes him better.  Okudah can cover any WR in the NFL right now--today.

We do not realize how bad the CB position was this year for 2 reasons:  We had a ton of sacks/pressure on the QB, minimizing the oppositions ability to pick apart the secondary, and teams could run on us and usually had a lead.  If we can practically shut down the opposition's #1 and #2 WRs, we are going to stay in games longer--and win a few.  While it may not seem like a top need, CB is a huge need.

Of course, if Bradberry walks, we might not have a choice if Okudah is on the board.

Next:  "The case to draft a QB at #7"

Your title should be, “The case to trade up for Okudah”. 
 

because we ain’t getting him at 7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Before we start analyzing the player, take a glimpse at the person.  In this link, Jeff Okudah announces that he is entering the draft in a letter to his mother who died of cancer recently.  It is hard to dismiss his character and determination to be great as her son. You see how he values teammates and has a mature concept of moment and opportunity.  This is a guy you want on your team.

https://www.theplayerstribune.com/en-us/articles/jeff-okudah-ohio-state-football

Then there is this:

The need to take the best CB in the draft at #7:  While we are all clamoring for OTs and DTs, there are a few factors that should be considered when you look at the team as a whole.  First, we have a raw LT with first round talent who was not really given a chance to develop this year.  I image the offseason will benefit Little.  Do not draft another one yet.  Secondly, this draft is loaded at DT and free agency will feature a DT or two, and we have some cap room (until Marty spends it all re-signing our own players).

Even if we pay Bradberry to return (I think Marty will give him a great deal to stay), we still do not have an answer on the other side.  Action Jackson needs to change his nickname to Tito--whatever happened to him?  I think he was out of position and would maximize his talent at Nickel.  Cockrell is depth at best.  By adding Okudah to the roster, you get a smart, agressive, long shut down CB who makes both outside CB spots better.   Bradberry no longer gets the #1 WR; he gets the #2.  That makes him better.  Okudah can cover any WR in the NFL right now--today.

We do not realize how bad the CB position was this year for 2 reasons:  We had a ton of sacks/pressure on the QB, minimizing the oppositions ability to pick apart the secondary, and teams could run on us and usually had a lead.  If we can practically shut down the opposition's #1 and #2 WRs, we are going to stay in games longer--and win a few.  While it may not seem like a top need, CB is a huge need.

Of course, if Bradberry walks, we might not have a choice if Okudah is on the board.

Next:  "The case to draft a QB at #7"

Alot of ppl here will crap on you because they have gone Oline crazy with no context...

But I applaud your attempt at thinking of a different path of improvements...

Good poo homie...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we hire a coach with a zone heavy defensive scheme then a CB at #7 almost certainly doesn't make sense.

didn't he generally play man coverage at Ohio St?  

I mean talent is talent but corners are weird sometimes about being great in man or zone looks sometimes

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...