Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Case to draft a QB at #7


MHS831

Recommended Posts

This will rile up the nut huggers, but it is an exercise in multiple perspective taking, a form of intelligence that permits one to consider alternatives to his or her own bias in a search for truth over appeasement.  So stop frothing and read this with an open mind, understanding that no decision is smart unless all options have been considered before making it. I like the case made here, by the way, but do not know that this is what I would do.

First, the only QB worth taking at #7 would be Tua (assuming Burrow is gone).  Personally, I think he is coming out (will announce Monday) and I would be shocked if he managed to slip by the Dolphins (5) and Chargers (6).  However, free agency can change a lot of scenarios.  . Tagovailoa completed 71.4 percent of his passes for 33 touchdowns and three interceptions in nine games. How do you let that go by?

 

If you noticed, Tua is LEFT HANDED.  That puts our best OL on his blindside---suddenly, we do not need an elite LT.  Now we can develop Little (as God intended) and find a G and/or C.  So drafting Tua eliminates the paranoia about LT.  It is almost a "no brainer" because we address needs at the game's top 2 positions with one pick.

A healthy Cam in 2020 is still a 31-year old running QB in a contract year.  He will seek a lucrative deal, probably in the $35m range. Nobody wants to see Cam replaced this way, but if you put your business hat on, his health concerns and salary demands put all of the risk on the Panthers if they commit to him.  Tepper knows risk. Doing that during a "rebuild" makes little sense.  A healthy Cam is worth $20m if he is developing Tua, but once he becomes a free agent, I do not see a third contract in the cards.  Would it be smarter to draft Tua and trade Cam?  To me, if Tua is there, the dilemma about Cam is, "do you want to trade him now or keep him for a year at $21m?"

The Cam supporters will argue, "Yeah, but what about 2015 and he has looked good when healthy.  How many games is that, dating back to 2017?  If you are the owner, Cam's health has cost your season ticket holders 2 seasons worth of hard-earned season passes, parking, etc.  Even if Cam gets a clean bill of health, how long will that last?  Sure, no player is guaranteed a clean bill of health, but Cam's playing style has led to him being hit more than any other QB in NFL history.  He takes on contact and leaps into the air over piles of defenders.  Did the QBs in the NFL playing after 35 years of age do that?  Which ones?  Cam may have a year or two or three left, but ultimately, we are going to need a QB. 

Ideally, what better scenario than to draft Tua and let him play behind Cam for a year?  Or what better scenario than to draft a QB and have him on a rookie contract for four years while you use the money you would have spent on Cam to rebuild the team?  Do we really need a $21m QB when we are rebuilding?  Keeping Cam is a romantic, emotional idea more than a practical one.  Get mad at that comment, but if Tua is somehow there, he makes a lot of sense.

That is the best argument I can make for Tua at #7.

Next:  The case for drafting a WR (Jeudy) at #7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

You better include gifs/tweets of this dudes ability to run EVERY route.

Cooper, Ridley and now Jeudy. 3 of the best route runners you’ll ever see. 

You are getting ahead of me Fua! I think Jeudy is better than the other 2.  Everyone who passes on him will look back in 5 years and question why they did not take him---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I find myself agreeing with your opinion more than others lately.. I can see getting the best WR or CB as a path of improvement just like getting another hog Mollie..

This is my argument, not my opinion, but I get what you are saying.  My point is--we have many needs--to focus on the OL is to neglect the other needs--at least in discussions.  We should be considering DBs, DTs, OTs, QBs, etc as we look forward---before free agency---none of this will matter afterwards.  And I thought everyone agrees with me---this is a bit shocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

How do you let that go by?

Maybe because the same type of injury ended the career of one of the greatest athletes this country has ever seen in Bo Jackson.

And, doesn't it make perfect sense to draft a QB after a major surgery to replace a QB who just underwent a major surgery?

*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT NECESSARILY AGREE WITH THIS* but don't be surprised to see Herbert or Fromm drafted come April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if Tua declares, there is no way he makes it past Dolphins AND Chargers.  He's not special enough to mortgage future drafts by moving up.

So this case is a moot point.

Oh, Burrow won't even have his seat warm at the draft before his name is called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...