Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With Shaq most likely moving to MLB... Will Burns play OLB in Rhule's 4-3?


Dex

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Dex said:

I think it's a legitimate question.

What did the Broncos do early in Vons career, were they 4-3 with him as OLB? I know he rushed a lot and would have his hand in the dirt. I can’t remember what Oakland ran early in Mack’s career either. Whatever those teams did for those guys, let’s replicate that (for Burns) haha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burns is not a sideline to sideline LB, he is an edge rusher. Having him anywhere else on the field would be a disservice and taking him away from what he does best.

Now about Shaq moving back to the outside or staying in the middle, that is a very good question. I could see him staying in the middle if we drafted someone like Simmons in the 1st. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You either try to teach Burns how to play weak side in a 4-3 (very difficult but with big upside) or have him pack on some more pounds and put his hand in the dirt (likely better situation and ability to be a consistent 10+ sack guy, but possibly weak in run D). Honestly though, if we’re going to a 4-3 I’d look into trading Burns. Wouldn’t give him away for free, but possibly would consider it for even an early 2nd, ideally a 1st to a team that runs a 3-4. He really is much better suited to 3-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Lobo said:

What did the Broncos do early in Vons career, were they 4-3 with him as OLB? I know he rushed a lot and would have his hand in the dirt. I can’t remember what Oakland ran early in Mack’s career either. Whatever those teams did for those guys, let’s replicate that (for Burns) haha. 

they ran a 3-4 defense where a LB plays essentially as a defensive end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This play was never designed to go to either DJ or Odunze. The primary read is Burden who is stymied early, with the outlet being Kmet if Caleb doesn't like the option for Burden. Given the situation it's pretty obvious the simple play is to take the free yards with Kmet, or if you want to be aggressive just wait a beat longer for Burden to uncover on his double move. If Moore was ever going to be a viable target in this play then Caleb should have started out reading Odunze to hold the safety in the middle and then coming to Moore, but because he started the snap staring down the right and then came back to the middle late it made it where the safety's leverage remained to the outside of Moore, so he would never have imagined that pass actually being thrown to him in that situation. Realistically DJ's best option in that context is to just occupy the safety to leave a hole open for Caleb to get it to Burden, which is probably why he throttles down vs carrying the safety across.
    • Even with Sonny Styles still on the board I thought it's a no brainer to address the Oline after Icky's injury.  And how can you pass up Fano at 19 given our situation. Then the rest of the draft just kind of made sense with maybe the exception of Klubnik.  But if Canales can fix him and Young goes down. . .I think it's a solid pick. What do you think of this draft?
    • When we didn't trade him to the Rams or the Bears (I believe the Bears said they would take one of Brown/ Burns/DJ Moore) we should have just signed him and kept him.  We should have traded him to the Rams obviously and we should have kept DJ and traded Burns.  We made all three wrong choices with Burns lol.
×
×
  • Create New...