Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The case for Okuda at CB


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this has been done. But everyone seems to be of the trenches vs QB vs WR camp.

Guess who our top rated CB was in 2019...

Javien Elliott    CB    67.2    
James Bradberry    CB    59.8
Ross Cockrell    CB    57.5   
Donte Jackson    CB    55.6

That's right THE Javien Elliott.

Tre Boston was our second highest rated defensive player btw at 76.4

Okuda's weaknesses are that he is too athletic. He would make an immediate impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Happy Panther said:

Sorry if this has been done. But everyone seems to be of the trenches vs QB vs WR camp.

Guess who our top rated CB was in 2019...

Javien Elliott    CB    67.2    
James Bradberry    CB    59.8
Ross Cockrell    CB    57.5   
Donte Jackson    CB    55.6

That's right THE Javien Elliott.

Tre Boston was our second highest rated defensive player btw at 76.4

Okuda's weaknesses are that he is too athletic. He would make an immediate impact.

Any defensive secondary playing behind a weak and injury-depleted DLine is going to have issues. If they can't pressure the QB consistently, then the QB has much more time to find the open man.

Look at it this way. Yes, Okudah *might* be good enough to hold his own, but unless the DLine can pressure effectively, the QB will simply choose another target.

Realistically, those stats don't support drafting a CB. They support drafting a DLineman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s be honest...I don’t think anyone would be unhappy if we got Okunda at 7, or DT, or OT. We need all three and as long as they are top rated at the position, We could use them and go need on rounds 2-7 and pick up pieces in FA. Top cornerbacks, Top Defensive tackles, and top OTs cost you a ton in free agency, so any superstar in those positions that we can pick up at 7 would be welcomed with open arms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Raleigh PF said:

Any defensive secondary playing behind a weak and injury-depleted DLine is going to have issues. If they can't pressure the QB consistently, then the QB has much more time to find the open man.

Look at it this way. Yes, Okudah *might* be good enough to hold his own, but unless the DLine can pressure effectively, the QB will simply choose another target.

Realistically, those stats don't support drafting a CB. They support drafting a DLineman.

 Let's talk about normal D lines given any scheme won't work with broken down injured D lines. I think that shutdown corners help the d line more than a d line helps the secondary if 4 receivers come open immediately.  No one can generate pressure on the D line if the quarterback is getting the ball out in under 3 seconds all day unless you cover then off the line and make the quarterback hold the ball instead of playing pick and catch with multiple open guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Raleigh PF said:

Any defensive secondary playing behind a weak and injury-depleted DLine is going to have issues. If they can't pressure the QB consistently, then the QB has much more time to find the open man.

Look at it this way. Yes, Okudah *might* be good enough to hold his own, but unless the DLine can pressure effectively, the QB will simply choose another target.

Realistically, those stats don't support drafting a CB. They support drafting a DLineman.

Umm...we had the 2nd most sacks in the league this year behind only Pittsburgh. Yes we sucked against the run but the statistical evidence doesn’t support the notion the secondary looked bad because we couldn’t pressure the Qb. We had an effective pass rush, we just couldn’t stop the run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Umm...we had the 2nd most sacks in the league this year behind only Pittsburgh. Yes we sucked against the run but the statistical evidence doesn’t support the notion the secondary looked bad because we couldn’t pressure the Qb. We had an effective pass rush, we just couldn’t stop the run.

What percentage of plays resulted in a sack exactly? It's not a high percentage. I'd rather see the percentage of times we were able to get pressure on the QB in comparison to the rest of the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Raleigh PF said:

What percentage of plays resulted in a sack exactly? It's not a high percentage. I'd rather see the percentage of times we were able to get pressure on the QB in comparison to the rest of the league.

Per

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/opp.htm

Pressure % at 25.2, tied with Bears for 7th best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera: Loved vets and also pressure up front. Money was always invested there in his tenure and not much in the secondary. 

New Coaching Staff: I don't have a clue which makes this offseason so intriguing. With our last regime I would seriously doubt a high pick at CB, but I just am not sure what they will do. They could go CB, DT, LB, OT, WR or QB. We have so many holes. I am interested to see if Rhule tries to fix the offense first or the defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...