Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Love Smoke: A Story of Hope (Very Important)


saX man

Recommended Posts

Hello.

jfgfwh5gvblgemgdafkb.jpg

I have a wish.

This wish is for the most beautiful smokescreen.

The Colts are in love with a man named Love.

AND I believe in a thing called love.   

This has me giddy.  Giddy for three fitty.

God+damn+loch+ness+monster+i+aint+giving

hqdefault.jpg

Jordan Love

1171243512.jpeg&c=sc&w=736&h=485

Let us create the smoke screen at 7. 

Hype this m'fer to the moon.

Visit him.

Bring him into Charlotte.

Dine him. Show him the town.

All as the ploy.  Get Indy nervous.

Now let's cut into this.

51bugbAiP-L._SX425_.jpg

You know why?

Because Indy has 2 second round picks.  One being pick #44 which is right on the money in trade value.

Soooooooooooo:

Pick #7 for Pick 13 & 44 AT A MINIMUM. 

DO IT MARTY DAMMIT.  DO IT.

0504064021b1d7e29667e4434bca27b5.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, saX man said:

Hello.

jfgfwh5gvblgemgdafkb.jpg

I have a wish.

This wish is for the most beautiful smokescreen.

The Colts are in love a man named Love.

ANd I believe in a thing called love.   

This has me giddy.  Giddy for three fitty.

God+damn+loch+ness+monster+i+aint+giving

Jordan Love

1171243512.jpeg&c=sc&w=736&h=485

Let us create the smoke screen at 7. 

Hype this m'fer to the moon.

Visit him.

Bring him into Charlotte.

Dine him. Show him the town.

All as the ploy.  Get Indy nervous.

Now let's cut into this.

51bugbAiP-L._SX425_.jpg

You know why?

Because Indy has 2 second round picks.  One being pick #44 which is right on the money in trade value.

Soooooooooooo:

Pick #7 for Pick 13 & 44 AT A MINIMUM. 

DO IT MARTY DAMMIT.  DO IT.

0504064021b1d7e29667e4434bca27b5.jpg

 

 

 

If Indy thinks we are interested in Love, would they trade with us or the Chargers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

If Indy thinks we are interested in Love, would they trade with us or the Chargers?

I think the Chargers are wanting Herbert. So you wine and dine both Herbert and Love. Makes Chargers scared to trade down and Colts needing to trade up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

I think the Chargers are wanting Herbert. So you wine and dine both Herbert and Love. Makes Chargers scared to trade down and Colts needing to trade up.

Ok, but if they think you covet a player like Love, and they call you to trade, and you say "NO!!" then you know that Indy is trying to move up--what do they need, and why would they move up?  for a QB!!  Now the Colts just signaled to the Panthers that they are looking to move up.  They would think that the Panthers would use this knowledge to deal with the Giants, for example.  Knowing that the Panthers are now going to deal with the Giants, the Colts have to call Detroit, and the cost just got a lot higher.

When we drafted Moton,  word on the street was that we wanted Dion Dawkins.  Oddly, even though the GM for the Bills was recently a Panther (Beane), the Bills (seeming to know our intent) did not trade with us--they worked out a deal with the Falcons, picking before us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

I think the Chargers are wanting Herbert. So you wine and dine both Herbert and Love. Makes Chargers scared to trade down and Colts needing to trade up.

Ding ding ding dingaling. 

We smoke the Herbert and Love brisket and will acquire Kinlaw or Epenesa at 13. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Why? So Marty can piss away two 2nd round picks?

There is gonna be a stud of an OT or DT there at #7. Take him unless someone absolutely blows us away with an offer we can't refuse. An extra 2nd ain't that IMO. Especially a 2nd round pick made by Marty Hurney.

I get the reluctance but this is a deep DT and OT draft, we could still get a player at #13. I don't prefer it but I wouldn't hate it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
    • See you guys had me wrong the other day I'm not a blind homer I just like more than a game sample size, that and with Morrow at fault for 4 goals i wanted to see if they could adjust and if rod the dud would play Boom. Well we got the answer.
×
×
  • Create New...