Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, raz said:

who woulda thought trump and kungfudude were on the same page

As usual, offering no actual input or useful information. I am pretty sure most have figured out what you are at this point. I see lots of posters with articles, even personal anecdotes and yet you just offer snide commentary and shrill, panicky speculation packaged as factual information. 

Like I said....good luck with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, jasonluckydog said:

2 months ago I was sick for 13 days bad sick. I'm starting to wonder if I got it back then. 

Up around Seattle, we honestly think this think has been floating around since December, though in very low numbers.  That FLU study they did before the outbreak, they went back and tested swabs and found some were positive for COVID19 and this was before the first case was "confirmed" in Washington state but per usual, the Government forced the DR to stop what he was doing.  It makes sense since cases are now just popping up everywhere and they have no clue how it happened.  It happened because people were spreading this around before we even really knew what it was.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Wolfpredator said:

Up around Seattle, we honestly think this think has been floating around since December, though in very low numbers.  That FLU study they did before the outbreak, they went back and tested swabs and found some were positive for COVID19 and this was before the first case was "confirmed" in Washington state but per usual, the Government forced the DR to stop what he was doing.  It makes sense since cases are now just popping up everywhere and they have no clue how it happened.  It happened because people were spreading this around before we even really knew what it was.  

Yep. Colorado's governor has publicly stated that even though we're in the neighborhood of 200 cases confirmed in the state, the real number is likely in the thousands.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm passing this along after talking to a few friends in the military and or government. All of us need to get any business or personal affairs in order asap (unless it can be done from your home). Banks, stores, etc. If you have family close by make sure they are set with weeks worth of supplies and Rx. We are about to be heavily restricted in our movements. I honestly have nothing else to add but this advice needs to be taken seriously.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Murph said:

I'm passing this along after talking to a few friends in the military and or government. All of us need to get any business or personal affairs in order asap (unless it can be done from your home). Banks, stores, etc. If you have family close by make sure they are set with weeks worth of supplies and Rx. We are about to be heavily restricted in our movements. I honestly have nothing else to add but this advice needs to be taken seriously.

If this doesn’t happen are you willing to risk a permaban 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Murph said:

Sure. It doesn't really matter either way. I'm not saying we're all going to die. Just be prepared for some kind of lockdown. 

I think pharmacies and grocery stores will stay open but I agree everyone needs to put their poo in order really fuging quick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Murph said:

Sure. It doesn't really matter either way. I'm not saying we're all going to die. Just be prepared for some kind of lockdown. 

The lockdown is already in place.  The only thing that will change is the degree of the lockdown, ie the level of restrictions.

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep. Colorado's governor has publicly stated that even though we're in the neighborhood of 200 cases confirmed in the state, the real number is likely in the thousands.

I am weirdly in agreement with some of the government's position on the numbers. I do think we should be testing more people because that data is valuable but I do not think that the general public should get that information at all. They have already panicked at an extreme level and it is just going to make that issue worse. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Harbingers said:

Both drugs that have shown success in Japan and elsewhere are not FDA approved. Thanks FDA. 

They also do not work in the most serious cases - like the ones where they failed to test to find out you had it, because they didn't have the tests or said you didn't qualify for a test, and the virus multiplies in your body because you aren't getting the drugs that might have helped earlier in the disease progression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

They also do not work in the most serious cases - like the ones where they failed to test to find out you had it, because they didn't have the tests or said you didn't qualify for a test, and the virus multiplies in your body because you aren't getting the drugs that might have helped earlier in the disease progression.

One of them does. The Ciclesodine or w/e. But that’s for severe cases that have already progressed into pneumonia. The asthma inhaler. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • 1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...