Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Derrick Brown is not a sexy pick."


Recommended Posts

It seems like he’s more of a Star type than a prime KK or Donald/Cox type. Not a terrible thing but a little high to pick a DL who isn’t an elite pass rusher. Maybe he can develop there quicker than Star though. Imagine if Star was dominating in the run game AND picking up 6+ sacks consistently. I think Brown has that potential but has a ways to go to develop as a pass disrupter. Will help our atrocious run D immediately however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the plan is resign KK if he bounces back then I think this will solve a lot of problems across the d-line. We need a legitimately strong line that can hold its own and generate pressure without clever schemes and blitzing. Haven't had that since 2013.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OneBadCat said:

If the plan is resign KK if he bounces back then I think this will solve a lot of problems across the d-line. We need a legitimately strong line that can hold its own and generate pressure without clever schemes and blitzing. Haven't had that since 2013.

Exactly, this guy unlocks the d-line. That is value far beyond simply being a run stuffer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, t96 said:

It seems like he’s more of a Star type than a prime KK or Donald/Cox type. Not a terrible thing but a little high to pick a DL who isn’t an elite pass rusher. Maybe he can develop there quicker than Star though. Imagine if Star was dominating in the run game AND picking up 6+ sacks consistently. I think Brown has that potential but has a ways to go to develop as a pass disrupter. Will help our atrocious run D immediately however.

He's relied on his pure strength and athleticism to dominate guy's 1-on-1 in college and I'm sure will have to improve his technique in some way in the NFL for his pass rushing. That being said, I think Star is the absolute worst case scenario Brown will be. Looking back at his film, there are just very few instances of him being blocked 1-on-1 and when it happened, it usually ended up badly for the opposing offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, t96 said:

It seems like he’s more of a Star type than a prime KK or Donald/Cox type. Not a terrible thing but a little high to pick a DL who isn’t an elite pass rusher. Maybe he can develop there quicker than Star though. Imagine if Star was dominating in the run game AND picking up 6+ sacks consistently. I think Brown has that potential but has a ways to go to develop as a pass disrupter. Will help our atrocious run D immediately however.

So was so much more valuable to us than people realized. That being said, Brown is better than Star

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

He's relied on his pure strength and athleticism to dominate guy's 1-on-1 in college and I'm sure will have to improve his technique in some way in the NFL for his pass rushing. That being said, I think Star is the absolute worst case scenario Brown will be. Looking back at his film, there are just very few instances of him being blocked 1-on-1 and when it happened, it usually ended up badly for the opposing offense

Agree I think a similar impact to Star is the worst case scenario. That’s not terrible at all but would be tough for such a high pick. I actually thought Star was ultimately a slight disappointment compared to his pre draft potential — if not for the heart issue he’d have been top 5 and his NFL play has been less than one would hope from a top 5 caliber player

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, t96 said:

It seems like he’s more of a Star type than a prime KK or Donald/Cox type. Not a terrible thing but a little high to pick a DL who isn’t an elite pass rusher. Maybe he can develop there quicker than Star though. Imagine if Star was dominating in the run game AND picking up 6+ sacks consistently. I think Brown has that potential but has a ways to go to develop as a pass disrupter. Will help our atrocious run D immediately however.

IDK man, to me he seems to be almost the exact opposite of Star.  Much more Aaron Donald than Star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

So was so much more valuable to us than people realized. That being said, Brown is better than Star

Losing Star was huge, yes, and we made a mistake trying to replace him with the likes of Butler, Poe, and even McCoy... But that type of DT is easier to find than a stud pass rushing DT like a Donald or Cox. If spending a top 7 pick on a DT it’s tough to justify the value there unless he can be a great pass rusher too. 
 

**I think Brown can be and am generally cool with the pick, but he does have a lot of work to do there before he can be an impact in the passing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, joemac said:

IDK man, to me he seems to be almost the exact opposite of Star.  Much more Aaron Donald than Star.

As far as athleticism goes, Brown is the Berson to Donald’s Steve Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My friend, pretty much stayed at his level for the next 30 years. But he is own boss and happy I guess. Not a bad guy personally.  That is probably Tepper. 
    • Banking your hopes on a couch FA that has a cup of tea NFL career to date as an almost 31 year old QB is certainly something. Especially when you consider that he has spent literally zero time in our offense so far. I think that White might be solid competition and possibly be better than Hendon Hooker, which is certainly a very low bar to clear.  That's probably about where the level is for White. He's a potential upgrade to our PS QB.
    • I need to look more into how pass block win rate is calculated. Like, if the other team gets a coverage sack because nobody is open and the guy I am blocking gets free to pressure/sack the QB after 5 seconds, is that considered a pass block "loss"? I honestly don't think our pass blocking has been that bad this year (outside of Nijman at LT week 1 and Zavala for 2 out of 3 games). For the most part, teams aren't getting by with a 4 man rush and are having to blitz. Looks like teamrankings says we are 10th in sacks allowed (1.7/game) - and that isn't because we have a QB getting the ball out at an elitely quick rate.
×
×
  • Create New...