Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I don't know if we're actually trading Samuel but...

PantherPhann89

By PantherPhann89,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

PantherPhann89 Mentor

PantherPhann89

Posted
Posted

But I do know that it most likely won't be to the Eagles because they just traded for Marquise Goodwin from the 49'ers. Currently, the Eagles will have DeSean Jackson, Alshon Jeffery , Goodwin and youngsters Reagor, Arcega-Whiteside and Deontay Burnett. I don't see room for Samuels on their roster. Unless things change, we'll trot out Robbie Anderson, Pharoh Cooper,  Keith Kirkwood,  DJ Moore, Curtis Samuel and about 5 others including Seth Roberts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnHurnBurn Newbie

BurnHurnBurn

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

The Packers could make a lot of sense if Samuel does end up being gone.  GB told Rodgers they'd get him weapons, and instead got his replacement.  If they can spin their "plan" was to get a somewhat proven WR over a rookie maybe Rodgers won't pout all year. 

Tom Brady is the only QB that pitches more of a bitchfit when its not goin good.  Rodgers has gotten such a pass for his  douchebaggery.  Its the type of diva nonsense people say about Cam except Aaron really does that poo.  I hate double standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherPhann89 Mentor

PantherPhann89

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

The Packers could make a lot of sense if Samuel does end up being gone.  GB told Rodgers they'd get him weapons, and instead got his replacement.  If they can spin their "plan" was to get a somewhat proven WR over a rookie maybe Rodgers won't pout all year. 

Yes it actually would. They have Adams and Fun Fun....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gesualdo Newbie

Gesualdo

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BurnHurnBurn said:

Tom Brady is the only QB that pitches more of a bitchfit when its not goin good.  Rodgers has gotten such a pass for his  douchebaggery.  Its the type of diva nonsense people say about Cam except Aaron really does that poo.  I hate double standards.

As much as I hate Tom Brady, there's no way in hell he could ever match Aaron's pout power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trucpfan Mentor

trucpfan

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

The Packers could make a lot of sense if Samuel does end up being gone.  GB told Rodgers they'd get him weapons, and instead got his replacement.  If they can spin their "plan" was to get a somewhat proven WR over a rookie maybe Rodgers won't pout all year. 

Why would the heck would we trade a key piece to our new offense. I’m not seeing it we didn’t in the draft we’re NOT depleting our offense this is Joe Brady’s first season I’m pretty sure he’s trying to start out with a bang. Think about a young Kyle Shannon or Sean M young offensive guru. He’s not getting rid of a dynamic playmaker who’s only knock is getting catchable passes. We didn’t even look at the offense in the draft because Brady probably said I can score 28 if you can get a few stops we’ll win. We have a electric playmaker in Samuels, best RB in the league. A true savage dog leader in yac in WR in DJ and a leader in yards per pass in RA. Who gets rid of key pieces with no replacement to start his nfl career. It doesn’t make sense we’ve beefed up our O in free agency. And then addressed our d in the draft. Now with good coaching we can win 10 games based off our opponents maybe less hopefully more but our offense was strong last year I’d expect a much stronger showing with TB. Our d was ass we should be average atleast on defense which plays out to be a pretty good team

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wes21 Mentor

Wes21

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, BurnHurnBurn said:

Tom Brady is the only QB that pitches more of a bitchfit when its not goin good.  Rodgers has gotten such a pass for his  douchebaggery.  Its the type of diva nonsense people say about Cam except Aaron really does that poo.  I hate double standards.

Being a douchebag is what cost Rodgers being the #1 overall pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stbugs Grand Master

stbugs

Posted
Posted

We didn’t draft a WR, Samuel isn’t going anywhere. The drop off behind him is huge. If you want 3 WRs on the field, Samuel is it. None of the other WRs is close in talent. Seth Roberts is 29 and hasn’t ever eclipsed 500 yards or 5 TDs. Cooper is a returner and has 243 yards and 1 TD as his best. Kirk wood has 13 career receptions. Every other WR is an UDFA. It’s laughable that people still think in Brady’s offense that we’d trade our only real WR3. Samuel is so much more talented than everyone except Moore and probably on the same level as Anderson. He’s not going anywhere if the staff thinks we can compete. Also, the rest of the WRs is why I think Bayless has a great shot of making the team if he’s decent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherPhann89 Mentor

PantherPhann89

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 hours ago, trucpfan said:

Why would the heck would we trade a key piece to our new offense. I’m not seeing it we didn’t in the draft we’re NOT depleting our offense this is Joe Brady’s first season I’m pretty sure he’s trying to start out with a bang. Think about a young Kyle Shannon or Sean M young offensive guru. He’s not getting rid of a dynamic playmaker who’s only knock is getting catchable passes. We didn’t even look at the offense in the draft because Brady probably said I can score 28 if you can get a few stops we’ll win. We have a electric playmaker in Samuels, best RB in the league. A true savage dog leader in yac in WR in DJ and a leader in yards per pass in RA. Who gets rid of key pieces with no replacement to start his nfl career. It doesn’t make sense we’ve beefed up our O in free agency. And then addressed our d in the draft. Now with good coaching we can win 10 games based off our opponents maybe less hopefully more but our offense was strong last year I’d expect a much stronger showing with TB. Our d was ass we should be average atleast on defense which plays out to be a pretty good team

I agree wholeheartedly, but Samuel was rumored to be in trade talks entering the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soul Rebel Mentor

Soul Rebel

Posted
Posted

Now that the draft is over, the front office talk needs to be on re-signing him in advance of 2021 offseason, not trading him. He's only 23 and was sorely underutilized under the RR regime. Brady will use him properly and I can see a lot of motion with confusing defenses w/ Samuel and CMC out of the backfield. 

Samuel is about to blow up and we need to not be in another Bradberry situation this coming offseason. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...