Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers wouldn't have traded down even for a future 1st?


NAS

Recommended Posts

Interesting tidbit from Peter King who was practically embedded with the Bucs in their draft room.  Bucs were apparently frustrated of not being able to move up in the top 10.  Here's the quote that draws interest:

"With Peter King of NBC’s Football Morning in America virtually embedded in the Bucs’ draft room (via a tablet in Licht’s house), he got a peek at the dealings.

After a round of 30 pre-draft calls, he had a sense of how things were going to go, and the way the first six picks in the draft fell, it became clear it was going to be tough.

Quote

The Panthers were set on taking defensive tackle Derrick Brown, with Bucs director of pro scouting Rob McCartney telling Licht “I don’t think they’d deal even if we offer next year’s one.” Likewise, the Cardinals wouldn’t take Licht’s call, content to choose linebacker-safety Isaiah Simmons. They then offered a third- and a fourth-rounder to Jacksonville to move up to nine, but the Jaguars preferred to sit tight and take cornerback C.J. Henderson. With the Browns and Jets clearly looking for tackles themselves, calls were made, but the reality was they weren’t likely partners.

Why was it so obvious to everyone that Panthers were in love with Derrick Brown and wouldn't even entertain a trade offer?  For the record, I'm glad we drafted Brown but it bothers me that everyone knew who we were taking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that part you bolded actually in the article? I don't see it so if not, quite misleading, as it says nothing about it being clear the Panthers being set on taking Brown and Tampa is actually assuming Carolina wouldn't trade. Here what I see as the actual quote and only reference to Carolina:

"Licht made about 30 calls during the week, up and down, to see which teams might want to go up or down in the top half of the draft. Tonight, Carolina (picking seven) is a no. “I don’t think they’d deal even if we offer next year’s one,” McCartney, who’d been the Panthers contact, tells Licht."

All that means is that Tampa felt confident someone Carolina valued highly was still available, and they didn't even try to ask. Tampa could have thought Carolina wanted Simmons.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Is that part you bolded actually in the article? I don't see it so if not, quite misleading, as it says nothing about it being clear the Panthers being set on taking Brown and Tampa is actually assuming Carolina wouldn't trade. Here what I see as the actual quote and only reference to Carolina:

"Licht made about 30 calls during the week, up and down, to see which teams might want to go up or down in the top half of the draft. Tonight, Carolina (picking seven) is a no. “I don’t think they’d deal even if we offer next year’s one,” McCartney, who’d been the Panthers contact, tells Licht."

All that means is that Tampa felt confident someone Carolina valued highly was still available, and they didn't even try to ask. Tampa could have thought Carolina wanted Simmons.

 

You're right, sorry, there was another article on PFF that said what I highlighted.  https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/04/27/bucs-were-frustrated-with-inability-to-trade-earlier/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NAS said:

You're right, sorry, there was another article on PFF that said what I highlighted.  https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/04/27/bucs-were-frustrated-with-inability-to-trade-earlier/

Gotcha, though even in that article there is still nothing proving Carolina was locked in. I'm not saying it wasn't known but more that there's nothing here confirming that for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And would we really ever consider trading down to a division rival knowing that we'd have whoever they picked inflicted upon us at least twice a year?

No chance in hell that Tampa was trading with us, or NO, or ATL. Really, dumbest idea of the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Gotcha, though even in that article there is still nothing proving Carolina was locked in. I'm not saying it wasn't known but more that there's nothing here confirming that for sure.

Fair point, I guess it's more implied than factual that we were set on taking Brown.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was a good draft pool in enough positions that I'm not surprised that trading up was difficult.  I thought there were probably 12-15 players who were "must picks" if they were available when a given team's time came, unless they happened to be in a position that the team was stocked and young at. 

Combine that with the fact that with the possible exception of the Chargers, the first 11 teams were in need of help almost everywhere, trading up was going to have to be a very good deal for them (us, since we were on that list). 

Looking at next year's draft pool a year in advance is always questionable.  Every diamond a team identifies is an injury or down season away from being a risk.  I think that is even more true with the QB position than others.  Trying to trade up this year by offering something in next year's draft was asking a team to trade away a known commodity in a stocked draft pool most likely in a position of need for speculation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...