Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave Gettleman signing CB Ross Cockrell (UPDATE: they are not)


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

Should've been our vet in the CB room, and never understood not bringing him back. He's not going to magically make us win (or lose) more games.  Smart guy, vet, could've been a leader in the secondary where they'll need all the help in the world. 

I don’t mind us not signing him if we are just giving the young guys a chance. I just don’t get why we seem to be rebuilding (lost a ton of FAs) and still pay a guy like Short $13M this year when he’s clearly on our 1 year plan or not just start Grier when we could have had our pick of the top QB in what appears to be the best top QB draft in a long time. Oh well, here’s to not having an extra $60-90M in cap and extra picks to splurge when the young guys would be ready to compete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, bull123 said:

Something smells here....he is a player that teams would want, including us,....he must want a ton of cash

I don't think it's that. I think it's that teams fall in love with "potential". They have young guys on rookie contracts who they think will become something or guys like Eli Apple who were 1st round picks at some point and we're supposed to be great and ended up busting. Guys like Cockrell are solid but they have low ceilings. You know what you're getting. They're not gonna help you but they're not gonna hurt your either. Teams would rather roll the dice. There are a few positions that teams will spend real money on career JAGs - QB, LT, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I would too. He's better than Eli Apple. 

Depends on what kind of coverage you are running.  If it's mostly zone Cockrell is much better and it's not even close.  In man, Apple might be a better fit.  No one is going to play all one or the other but if you plan on playing more man idk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bull123 said:

still dont get it...i would take him in a heartbeat...very solid depth

It seems like he wants way more then anyone’s going to give em. He played well actually so I understand but our overall d was ugly so I can see moving on from any jags from last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/9/2020 at 9:15 AM, stbugs said:

I don’t mind us not signing him if we are just giving the young guys a chance. I just don’t get why we seem to be rebuilding (lost a ton of FAs) and still pay a guy like Short $13M this year when he’s clearly on our 1 year plan or not just start Grier when we could have had our pick of the top QB in what appears to be the best top QB draft in a long time. Oh well, here’s to not having an extra $60-90M in cap and extra picks to splurge when the young guys would be ready to compete.

Tepper doesn't want to weather the profit loss that would come with really starting over. Let the franchise star walk, overpay an intriguing enough replacement so that fans don't completely check out as you rebuild. I hate that this comparison keeps applying but Jordan tried the same with the Hornets.

McCaffery played a huge part too I'm sure. Runningbacks already have shortened careers and CMC may especially due to heavy usage. Full rebuild means wasting some of his best years and who knows how many we're working with.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure how much he was a long term piece of this team.   Sucks to not have him as part of the rotation.   Looks like it's Lee Hunter time.     
    • This post was an error. Oops and sorry for the errors in the previous one. Too slow to edit.   We’ll see what they do.  
    • I am not sure he will put the over the games but we’ll probably have them.   Two things I am thinking.  We have 4 preseason games.  All the coaches have enough service time to know the standards that are in place for decades. If I recall it was play your starters just a series to start woth and build it up until week theee where play a lot and you have week four to set hour roster. Evaluate before cuts.   Bevell will certainly have the whole thing down pat.   I’d they don’t do the fries and frie air will worry too. Because it is set up to do that.     I have said since they went t three preseason people have to figure a new way are still feeling it out and trying things.  We don’t have to this year.  
×
×
  • Create New...