Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC says there is no need for a rebuilding year.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

"We have the guys to win. We've put ourselves in position to win two weeks in a row. We've shown that we can win, we just have to do it," McCaffrey said. "You can't beat yourselves and we've got to play good team football. We've shown that we can do that, so there's no need to be a rebuilding year. With some kinks here and there that we have to iron out, I think it's time to start play winning football. We know we can, so like I said, now it's just time to go out there and do it."

 

from SI.

 

I get it. This is the mentality any pro athlete must have if he want to succeed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good they believe in themselves.  It's much harder to actually produce above your abilities when everyone else around you is struggling as well.  The problem lies in the abilities of those around him and those problems cannot be fixed in one off-season.  But keep pounding!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moo Daeng said:

Tell an nfl player like him, Cam, Luke, Olsen, or Davis to tank for a draft pick.

This is precisely why I always say tanking is not a real on field thing. You rarely make it to professional football as a player or coach if you aren't competitive and want to win. Tanking is a front office thing when you completely gut a roster. Miami did it. Jacksonville did it. We are doing it. 

That doesn't mean these guys are going to lay down and give up. If they did, why in the world would anyone want them on their team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

This is precisely why I always say tanking is not a real on field thing. You rarely make it to professional football as a player or coach if you aren't competitive and want to win. Tanking is a front office thing when you completely gut a roster. Miami did it. Jacksonville did it. We are doing it. 

That doesn't mean these guys are going to lay down and give up. If they did, why in the world would anyone want them on their team?

Been thinking about the merits of this a lot lately, especially every time I visit this board. The notion of tanking rattles every competitive bone in my body. On the field, it’s fundamentally antagonistic to establishing a winning culture.  When you reach the highest levels of competition where raw talent roughly evens out, the difference in success is often those who want it more and work harder. For football, see Jerry Rice. 
 

However, as you address, there is arguably a distinction between those playing the game and those putting the people in position to play the game. Particularly with the rise of analytics based thinking (and employment) across professional sports, the notion of a strategic based “tank” has become more accepted, especially in NBA and the MLB. Those embracing the notion retort that it doesn’t undermine the competitive spirit at all; the front office is still trying to win, just trying to win the long game.

I’m skeptical that trying to balance this philosophical conflict between players/coaches and the front office can be successful in the NFL. In the NBA, it can work because individual players can have such a dramatic impact on the makeup of the team and generally the contract structures and culture are more conducive to quickly building teams. In the mlb, it can work because of the sheer volume of prospects (and trade capital) coupled with the unreliability of any prospect playing out make it viable. 
 

But the NFL and football in general cannot be isolated to individual players like those other sports. QB is the closest thing to it, but even then it requires a functioning scheme, receivers that can separate, running backs that can complement and a line that allows you to perform. Because the NFL has such high turnover and short careers, it’s hard to see all the necessary moving parts coming together with new players without an established competitive culture. The disjunct in philosophy between front office and players amidst a “rebuild” just seems self defeating in this light. In that vein, a hire like Rhule and his contract makes a lot of sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NAS said:

Yeah I like it. You don’t know want players to accept losing otherwise they will get stuck in that mode like Browns

And this is exactly what some of us have been saying. That's why I constantly harp on how competitive we have been in the face of the adversity and how I want to see that kind of mentality hold throughout what is likely to be a very tough season for any competitor. 

We all saw what it looks like when a coaching staff loses a team and they just start largely laying down. That was literally the second half of 2019 for us. It was awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

And this is exactly what some of us have been saying. That's why I constantly harp on how competitive we have been in the face of the adversity and how I want to see that kind of mentality hold throughout what is likely to be a very tough season for any competitor. 

We all saw what it looks like when a coaching staff loses a team and they just start largely laying down. That was literally the second half of 2019 for us. It was awful.

While I am encouraged that they haven't given up in the first 2 games so far it is only 2 games.  It's hard to endure heartbreaking loses without it getting to you no matter how strong you think you are.  Let's see where this teams breaking point ends up being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...