Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Chicago Bears at Carolina Panthers Gameday Thread


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just now, Smithers said:

Close game at half.  Rhule and staff will make some adjustments and get us rolling 

I'm not too sure we are not just overmatched. I mean we were not supposed to have this record and it was because we don't have a lot of talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SaltnPepper said:

It's a stupid rule. I didn't say it wasn't a rule.

We can thank liberals for crying about how dangerous football is for a lot of the stupid rules now including the onside kick rule.

You should change your name to DiamondAndSilk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snake said:

I'm not too sure we are not just overmatched. I mean we were not supposed to have this record and it was because we don't have a lot of talent. 

If the INT doesn’t happen we are likely leading right now. I think we can adjust. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB play is the difference at half.

They have 127 yards, we have 125. We've out-rushed them 78-13. But, Foles is 14-20 for 114 0 TDs and 0 TDs while Teddy is 5-12 for 60 yards 0 TDs and 1 INT.

We're hanging with them though. The question prior to this game was "are the 4-1 Bears legit?" Yeah, I think so. I don't think they're likely to be a SB contender, but they're a playoff team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

QB play is the difference at half.

They have 127 yards, we have 125. We've out-rushed them 78-13. But, Foles is 14-20 for 114 0 TDs and 0 TDs while Teddy is 5-12 for 60 yards 0 TDs and 1 INT.

We're hanging with them though. The question prior to this game was "are the 4-1 Bears legit?" Yeah, I think so. I don't think they're likely to be a SB contender, but they're a playoff team.

The int is the difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
    • Totally agree with you, if we had invested in drafting a corner or two I wouldn’t even ponder adding Ramsey. But, to be honest we legit added nobody to our corner room this offseason we have nobody worth developing. Even if Chau Smith Wade is better then what I think, he is the only guy we have invested draft capital into outside of our starters.
×
×
  • Create New...