Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saints basically have no wide receivers Sunday


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

You seem to forget they Have Taysom Hill(multi-position player) and he can do some damage to us even without WR's.

He's a gadget player and that's about it. It's like saying Curtis Samuel can do some damage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GoPanthers123 said:

That’s right and also Saints have no Defense.  We might not struggle in red zone against them.

Their defense is bad. Without almost every player except Kamara and Hill they might not even be the best team Sunday dare I say. People really don't understand the impact of having players like Thomas and Sanders do for a team. It's like us missing Curtis Samuel last week. He's not a elite WR but he's a guy who makes a team have to account for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Snake said:

He's a gadget player and that's about it. It's like saying Curtis Samuel can do some damage. 

And how many times has he torched us when he does play. Quite a few times. He was used in certain plays throwing our defense off to get a TD or extra yardage. He isn't a player you can just shrug off that easily. You can't compare a player that can play three or more positions to a player that just plays one position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

And how many times has he torched us when he does play. Quite a few times. He was used in certain plays throwing our defense off to get a TD or extra yardage. He isn't a player you can just shrug off that easily. You can't compare a player that can play three or more positions to a player that just plays one position.

With a FULL RECEIVING CORE. Curtis Samuel alone doesn't scare any defense nor does hill. Stop trying to push your wrongness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Orleans started a bunch of no-name receivers today and the Carolina Panthers answered with a zone defense that allowed Brees to complete 81% of his passes at an 8-yard per attempt clip.

Those no-name receivers simply ran a short route, found a place to stop and wait for a Brees pass. Doesn't get much easier than that. Just think what a little man coverage would have done for the non-existent pass rush? Everybody and their brother knows you have put Brees on the turf a couple times and get him off his spot and Carolina failed miserably in all respects, yet managed to keep themselves in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Daniel Jeremiah's top 50 players heading into the Combine.  Lol at the people still pining for Styles.  Dude will be LONG gone before our slot as I noted he would be.  Go ahead a keep drafting him at #19 if y'all want to keep ruining/making unrealistic mock drafts.   https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-s-top-50-2026-nfl-draft-prospect-rankings-2-0
    • Kmet is better than just 'meh'.   Mayer took a back seat to Bowers and is another TE that would relish a chance to start again.  Sanders, Temble and Evans is a better group of TEs than we've fielded during the Ian Thomas era, but it's far from stacked.  That's the problem, our TE room has sucked for so long now that  being 'better than crap' is apparently good enough--which it is not.
    • Why? Feels like we got a whole TE crew of almost Kmets. Loveland surpassed Kmet easy and relegated Kmet to Tremble like stats. Kmet’s decent years were because of volume. Kmet had over 90 targets twice in his career. Tremble’s career high in targets is 37. Tremble could produce Kmet numbers with the same volume so why would you ever go for Kmet? Loveland or Bowers type studs, go for it. Meh TEs, we’ve got plenty.
×
×
  • Create New...