Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Wouldn't Play McCaffrey This Week Or Next Week


PantherPhann89

Recommended Posts

McCaffrey means to much to this team. This is his 4th NFL season with no injuries till this year. A high ankle sprain that he came back from, played great and injured his shoulder, in the 4th quarter, in his first game back. Let's be honest, we'd love to see the Panthers win,  I do, but we aren't winning the Super Bowl this year, with or without McCaffrey. If shut McCaffrey, let him get his body right before putting him back in again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If he's healthy, let him play. If he's not and he risks further injury, sit him. It's really that simple.

It's not that simple though. He was healthy when he returned last week but athletes bodies need to stay ready, or you risk overcompensating, over thinking, protecting the prevoius injury or what have you and another injury occur. I'm not saying shut him down. I'm saying let's get him practicing at full speed before exposing him to further injuries...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PantherPhann89 said:

It's not that simple though. He was healthy when he returned last week but athletes bodies need to stay ready, or you risk overcompensating, over thinking, protecting the prevoius injury or what have you and another injury occur. I'm not saying shut him down. I'm saying let's get him practicing at full speed before exposing him to further injuries...

He got tackled and landed in a funky manner on his shoulder. That had nothing to do with any overcompensation or bodily readiness. It's just football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it’s not what he would want, but I would shut him down for the year. Even if he’s fully 100% healthy and no extra risk of injury, this is a lost year.  I’d rather avoid even the standard level of risk of him having another injury this year. Keep him fresh and ready for next year when we have our new QB and hopefully another few pieces to complete the roster and we have a real shot at winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He got tackled and landed in a funky manner on his shoulder. That had nothing to do with any overcompensation or bodily readiness. It's just football.

My "issue" is they put him right back to the loins share 98% of the load. I believe Davis only had one carry and played some lead FB for CMC at times. How fuging hard is it to give 75% of the carries to CMC and 23% to Davis (or 70/28 )?? Norv could not understand how this could be done, almost like a group of psycho fantasy footballers are holding the OCs' family at gun point during gameday.  Their was no easing him back in, there never is with him. "Lets take our by far highest paid RB at 16 million per and run him til he gets a injury method" has some flaws it seems...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Joe Person was asked about the possibility of shutting down McCaffrey in his Athletic Q&A and indicated that's probably not going to happen.

He did say that the staff won't rush him back, though.

I don't think CMC is giving the coaches a choice. It really sounded like they were gonna try and IR-DR him again(If that's possible?), If they can it would appear that's where the second opinion came in.

I really hate to think what would have happened this year if we didn't have the COVID/IR-DR list. We'd be royally screwed. Rhule sure got a boon out of this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offensive coordinators are play calling to keep their jobs, or in Brady's case, for a big money new head coaching job. They are not going to use a second rate RB much at all if CMC is available. Norv, Brady, the next OC, unless we have a RB with similar talent to CMC on the roster we're going to run CMC into the ground.

CMC is not going to have a long career imo. His body is going to break down early. We need to make sure we're not the one's holding the bag paying him a fortune to sit in a hospital.

Moving forward I don't want 1st round RBs and LBs. They get beaten to hell and end up on IR too much. You don't get your money's worth, and they don't have enough of an impact on today's game.

Once you have a good QB the premium picks should be o-line, WR, and TE. Why? You've already seen that we can possess the ball and pitch and catch all the way to the redzone with little to no difficulty. That's because the rules favor passing the ball. The reason we're not scoring in the 40's regularly is because our o-line and TE positions are below average, and we lack a #1 WR (the big athletic type of WR to target in the redzone). Passing game players are what matters most.

The defense should be built based on amazing value defensive players falling into our lap in the draft, or great bargains in free agency. Otherwise save your money for the passing game. Passing is easy, and you rack up pass interference calls to boot. It's perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are minor injuries and he’s 24, I don’t see why so many huddlers freak out about it and his contract. Let him play, I promise he will still play next season and the one after at a high level. Cant just reserve him until this team is relevant...no one knows when that’ll be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...