Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Outside of a QB who do you have and why?

DaveThePanther2008

By DaveThePanther2008,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted

Going to be really hard to evaluate talent based on the weird season (or lack of season for some) that 2020 has given us. Something tells me the number of busts in the first round of the draft will be way out of proportion this time around.

I'm not sure that I wouldn't prefer going to one of the less flashy positions with a first round pick. OL, MLB, S, TE. (And TE only if there is something impressive coming out of basketball (if there's a season there)).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

OL or DB. Really depends on where we draft. 

I REALLY wish we would have kept Bradberry over Shaq last offseason. Dude is playing fantastic. 

This was such a swing and miss on our part. Bradberry regularly locked up guys we will play against for the next 6-8 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Everyone wants a QB and rightly so but our chances of getting one of the top tier QB is slim.   If we can't get a QB?

What is your top pick and why.

I'm not a one to follow college players too much so I really wouldn't be able to give a clear choice.

Who do you want?

I don't think it's slim. We're currently sitting at 3 wins and there are 3 maybe 4 QBs considered top tier in this draft. Jags and Jets prob going QB and ahead of us. Dallas or Giants (one of the two, but not both) will prob be ahead of us. I think whoever it is takes Sewell. Then the Bengals and Chargers will be ahead of us and won't take QBs. I think we get to pick from Wilson or Lance, assuming nobody trades up. That being said if 3 of the top 4 are gone and we don't love the next QB in line, take hopefully Sewell if he's there

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WarHeel Mentor

WarHeel

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Varking said:

This was such a swing and miss on our part. Bradberry regularly locked up guys we will play against for the next 6-8 years. 

I was a big proponent for keeping Bradberry over Shaq. Most on here found him overrated but I’ll take consistency over the occasional flashy play with a giant splash of mediocrity. Looking at you “action” Jackson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

I was a big proponent for keeping Bradberry over Shaq. Most on here found him overrated but I’ll take consistency over the occasional flashy play with a giant splash of mediocrity. Looking at you “action” Jackson. 

Imagine having Bradberry, Douglas, Jackson and Elder as your top 4 corners? And we really wouldn't have had a big drop off at LB because they have stunk the whole time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

OL or DB. Really depends on where we draft. 

I REALLY wish we would have kept Bradberry over Shaq last offseason. Dude is playing fantastic. 

This. Constantly spending huge resources at LB and RB hasn't worked out well for us as a franchise, yet here we have many Panthers fans wanting to spend another high first round pick on a LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PootieNunu
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By PootieNunu · Posted

      It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • d-dave
      The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end

      By d-dave · Posted

      Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • KillerKat
      The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...