Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So was Hurney the one that decided to cut Cam?


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

How many Patriots games have you watched this year? I’ve watched every snap. He’s still capable of being a good QB. He still has his faults but he has literally nothing around him on offense. Worst skill position group than some colleges and that’s not an exaggeration. 
 

Keeping Cam had nothing to do with him being washed or not. It was a win/win situation. If he’s washed we’re in a better position than we are now because we wouldn’t owe a QB any money. If he was good which I believe he would have done well in this offense then you have a QB for the next few years. 
 

The TB decision was just dumb. 

I’ve watched quite a few. There are flashes of his old self but they are becoming more and more far and few between, there are also some big issues that have nothing to do with his weapons. 
 

I already stated best scenario would’ve been to let him play out his last year and not owe any QB money...not sure what the point of saying that is.

But resign him for a few years? Because he’s capable of being a good QB? Nah. He’s not Brady, Brees or Rodgers. I’d rather take the Chiefs, Bills, Ravens, Dolphin, Cardinals approach and draft the future than cling on to ‘capable of being good’ to play with this new coach, scheme, and GM. That’s the smart move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't even remember what your bad thread was. I just find it funny you're still mad weeks later. That's serious butthurt.

not butthurt my G, just like to call people out who abuse authority ya know? it is 2020.

I'll refresh your memory even though I'm sure you remember exactly what I'm talking about. 

I posed the question "would the panthers give Cam's #1 jersey to Zach Wilson if we drafted him?". Zach Wilson seems to be a favorite pick for us, and the question of Cam's relationship is still a hot topic and will be for years to come. Just later that evening, my speculation made it to Twitter where the owner of this forum was discussing the ensuing controversy. My thread was locked after 3 comments because you felt that "it would cause a poo storm".

Fast forward to this thread, I find it funny that a similar controversial / speculative thread was not locked - that is sure to cause a "poo storm". Is it perhaps because of the user that posted it's seniority? I'd love for you to break down the differences that allowed this thread to remain open vs mine.

I'm all about these sort of discussions, and so is pretty much every single user on here - including the dude that runs the show.

I'm sorry, but ever since I was kid in grade school - I have a thirst to call out the volunteer hall monitors of the world for abusing power.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

How many Patriots games have you watched this year? I’ve watched every snap. He’s still capable of being a good QB. He still has his faults but he has literally nothing around him on offense. Worst skill position group than some colleges and that’s not an exaggeration. 
 

Keeping Cam had nothing to do with him being washed or not. It was a win/win situation. If he’s washed we’re in a better position than we are now because we wouldn’t owe a QB any money. If he was good which I believe he would have done well in this offense then you have a QB for the next few years. 
 

The TB decision was just dumb. 

No he is not.  Dude his arm is shot.  Completely.  He is throwing at some weird angle and passes over 10 yards are a struggle add to the fact that he cannot run anymore (he hasnt gone over 50 yards in almost 2 months) then he is a liability.  There is no way you can watch him last sunday and not think he is kaput.  It sucks because we did it to him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

No he is not.  Dude his arm is shot.  Completely.  He is throwing at some weird angle and passes over 10 yards are a struggle add to the fact that he cannot run anymore (he hasnt gone over 50 yards in almost 2 months) then he is a liability.  There is no way you can watch him last sunday and not think he is kaput.  It sucks because we did it to him

This how I know you don’t watch games. Cam’s intermediate to deep passing game has been phenomenal this year. If you aren’t watching the games please don’t reply to my posts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GOAT said:

not butthurt my G, just like to call people out who abuse authority ya know? it is 2020.

I'll refresh your memory even though I'm sure you remember exactly what I'm talking about. 

I posed the question "would the panthers give Cam's #1 jersey to Zach Wilson if we drafted him?". Zach Wilson seems to be a favorite pick for us, and the question of Cam's relationship is still a hot topic and will be for years to come. Just later that evening, my speculation made it to Twitter where the owner of this forum was discussing the ensuing controversy. My thread was locked after 3 comments because you felt that "it would cause a poo storm".

Fast forward to this thread, I find it funny that a similar controversial / speculative thread was not locked - that is sure to cause a "poo storm". Is it perhaps because of the user that posted it's seniority? I'd love for you to break down the differences that allowed this thread to remain open vs mine.

I'm all about these sort of discussions, and so is pretty much every single user on here - including the dude that runs the show.

I'm sorry, but ever since I was kid in grade school - I have a thirst to call out the volunteer hall monitors of the world for abusing power.

 

Fight the man!!! LOL!

Repost the thread if you want but when you start getting attacked don't bother reporting the posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AceBoogie said:

This how I know you don’t watch games. Cam’s intermediate to deep passing game has been phenomenal this year. If you aren’t watching the games please don’t reply to my posts. 

You are high dude, he threw 4 passes in the friggin dirt on Sunday.  4.  His arm is shot.  He now has some weird throwing motion.  Its sad but its true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OneBadCat said:

Cam with Moore/Anderson/CMC/David/Samuel would have been nice to see.

Funny that we cut Cam in the same offseason when we finally fill the holes he needed help with for years.

If TB is 0/7 on game winning drives I believe Cam would probably win at least 3-4 of those just on big balls swag alone.

This has been keeping me up at night all season. The irony is a yard thick 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Is that a preferable outcome to the season in your eyes, compared to where we are currently headed (most likely 4-12)?  An absolute best case of 10-6 but likely somewhere between 4-12 and 10-6?

To not have Teddy and that salary on the roster yes, I believe it would be. Is it a better case vs having a high draft pick in this upcoming draft? I can't say.

I can say that while I feel an upgrade at QB is absolutely needed now and that Cam is declining (can still be a good QB but 2015 is a long time ago) I'm fairly agnostic as to how the upgrade is done. Getting a great young QB on a rookie contract is a common formula for success but I don't believe that's the only way to improve (see Ryan Tannehill). The staff and FO are paid to make those types of decisions and given the money thrown at Rhule and now a new GM I have some belief that they'll figure it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You are high dude, he threw 4 passes in the friggin dirt on Sunday.  4.  His arm is shot.  He now has some weird throwing motion.  Its sad but its true

He did throw some ugly passes on Sunday.  I will say though his long ball this year has looked much better than those short throws McDaniels has him throwing.  Young Cam would blast short throws at 150 mph and the receivers couldn't catch them, injured Cam throws them like they are lawn darts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30 Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
    • He isn't a good HC. I think he has proved that conclusively.
    • The missed tackle percentage is on that screen cap.
×
×
  • Create New...