Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have a chance at 4 1,000 yard players next week


TN05

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We have a chance at four 1000 yard skill position players and our QB has 15 passing TDs. Yikes.

15 TDs with this supporting cast is just straight up trash.

I just hope this staff doesn't keep riding this train and has the balls to find someone better and either bench or cut TB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, KillerKat said:

I just hope this staff doesn't keep riding this train and has the balls to find someone better and either bench or cut TB.

With David Tepper’s recent comments regarding the QB position it sure seems like he’s wanting QB to be fixed. Only question is if Rhule and Brady feel the same way. But then again over the past few weeks Rhule has seemed to let some of his frustration with Teddy slip out in his interviews that he then tries to walk back a bit. I’m pretty sure they’ll at least seriously consider upgrading the position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, this probably doesn't happen with  a healthy CMC! But, it just goes to show that we are pretty adept moving the ball. Not to sound like a broken record, but this lends credence to the opinion that Teddy leaves a lot to be desired, that Brady needs to improve, and that we need a complete TE who provides a legitimate target when in the red zone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

For the record, I find it equally annoying people like you celebrating this team shooting itself in the foot.

Don’t you pride yourself on being a “realist”? Which side of the aisle would you venture to guess is realistically a healthier outlook for watching football (i.e. entertainment)?

People like to “both sides” this and act like endlessly cheery and endlessly whiny football fans are just as bad as one another. Uh no...they’re absolutely, objectively not. You should aspire to become the type of fan who is mentally stable enough to quickly overcome a loss (or god forbid, a win) and take away some positives while looking forward to the next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, t96 said:

No dude your posts are just tiring. This is a positive thread. There are many positives to take away from this team and this interesting stat is one of them. Go cry with the other crybabies in the numerous threads about the draft position, not here. Yeah I get it, that aspect of it sucks. But seeing the defense improve over the course of the season and some positives from our WRs despite the QB play has been fun to see. I'm enjoying the ride, I'll be at the game next week too cheering for a win. I hope you can find a way to enjoy the rest of the season. And if not maybe you just shouldn't watch and do something else you might enjoy. You could try fishing or woodworking or something. Good day.

Some of the same people crying in every thread are the same ones that also believe in Rhule to be a master program builder.

You can’t have it both ways. This is part of what has brought Rhule success in the past. He’s managed to squeak out a few more wins year 1 than anticipated. It’s a good sign from a coaching standpoint.

Good quote from Rhule today. The Sixers are still a damn mess. 

I wasn’t pleased with losing out on the 3rd pick yesterday but Rhule is here for the long haul. It would’ve been a lot more discouraging had Rhule lost to a Haskins/Rivera led Redskins team.

At the end of the day if you believe in Rhule, and for our fandoms sake he needs to pan out, you just have to hope that yesterday’s win is good for the bigger picture. 

They know we need a QB. It’s no damn secret. Teddy looked god damn awful yesterday. The Panthers low key have a nice core of young guys right now. If they can address the OL this offseason it would put our future QB in nice position to succeed moving forward. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Some of the same people crying in every thread are the same ones that also believe in Rhule to be a master program builder.

You can’t have it both ways. This is part of what has brought Rhule success in the past. He’s managed to squeak out a few more wins year 1 than anticipated. It’s a good sign from a coaching standpoint.

Good quote from Rhule today. The Sixers are still a damn mess. 

I wasn’t pleased with losing out on the 3rd pick yesterday but Rhule is here for the long haul. It would’ve been a lot more discouraging had Rhule lost to a Haskins/Rivera led Redskins team.

At the end of the day if you believe in Rhule, and for our fandoms sake he needs to pan out, you just have to hope that yesterday’s win is good for the bigger picture. 

They know we need a QB. It’s no damn secret. Teddy looked god damn awful yesterday. The Panthers low key have a nice core of young guys right now. If they can address the OL this offseason it would put our future QB in nice position to succeed moving forward. 

 

Yep I agree. I'm a big fan of Rhule so far. Am I convinced he's the next Belichick or Reid? No definitely not yet, but almost everything we've seen from him so far has been positive. Success in any pro sports league comes from the top down. Owner then front office/coach then the players. I have been undecided on Tepper and still am, but the Rhule hire and firing Hurney have been extremely good signs for the future of this team. GM decision will be big and Rhule's development will be too, but as you said if those wind up being what we hope they are then getting a QB and building a successful team is only a matter of time. It took Andy Reid 4 years to get his QB in KC. Like any other fan, I can't wait to get an exciting young QB prospect here, but we need to be patient with it and trust in Rhule and the next GM. Better to be patient and get a guy in 2-3 years than for them to blindly take a QB they don't love this year and wind up with a situation like Haskins (who the Skins thought would be their savior when they drafted him...). I still hope that with this stacked QB class we can come away with a guy the front office and Rhule loves but if it doesn't happen then so be it. There are plenty of ways to build a successful team without having your QB in place immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, t96 said:

Yep I agree. I'm a big fan of Rhule so far. Am I convinced he's the next Belichick or Reid? No definitely not yet, but almost everything we've seen from him so far has been positive. Success in any pro sports league comes from the top down. Owner then front office/coach then the players. I have been undecided on Tepper and still am, but the Rhule hire and firing Hurney have been extremely good signs for the future of this team. GM decision will be big and Rhule's development will be too, but as you said if those wind up being what we hope they are then getting a QB and building a successful team is only a matter of time. It took Andy Reid 4 years to get his QB in KC. Like any other fan, I can't wait to get an exciting young QB prospect here, but we need to be patient with it and trust in Rhule and the next GM. Better to be patient and get a guy in 2-3 years than for them to blindly take a QB they don't love this year and wind up with a situation like Haskins (who the Skins thought would be their savior when they drafted him...). I still hope that with this stacked QB class we can come away with a guy the front office and Rhule loves but if it doesn't happen then so be it. There are plenty of ways to build a successful team without having your QB in place immediately.

You can have a talented roster but if your coaching staff sucks it’ll only get you so far. 
 

As much as it stings to potentially lose out on some of the top QB’s in this class, what good would it do if we landed one but Rhule sucks? We’ve seen that play out already with Rivera.
 

If Rhule ends up being every bit of what he’s supposed to be the rest will fall into place eventually. And if he turns out to be a poor coach (which I don’t think he is) a Zach Wilson isn’t going to be able to overcome that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A great QB would have 40, but a good one would definitely have 25+ for sure.

And look how close most of our games have been. Our record looks a lot different with 25+ passing TDs 

Our record would have looked better had we gotten just one more punt from the opponents in each game.

QB or not, if the defense isn't fixed, no one can win here. Only in games where we played  aggressively on defense did we win, no matter how much our offense scored. Case in point, the New Orleans game where we went toe to toe with them and lost on a record--setting FG attempt in the last moments. Had we just made them punt one danged time in the game, we'd have won it. We'd probably be sitting at 11-4 if could have forced one more punt in each of our losses.

We can talk all danged day about QBs, and yes Teddy leaves a lot to be desired, but by fixating on QB, you and others are widely missing the 800-pound gorilla in the room. And we've got some good and great pieces on defense, but our DC has a tendency to call the game like an old lady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Our record would have looked better had we gotten just one more punt from the opponents in each game.

QB or not, if the defense isn't fixed, no one can win here. Only in games where we played  aggressively on defense did we win, no matter how much our offense scored. Case in point, the New Orleans game where we went toe to toe with them and lost on a record--setting FG attempt in the last moments. Had we just made them punt one danged time in the game, we'd have won it. We'd probably be sitting at 11-4 if could have forced one more punt in each of our losses.

We can talk all danged day about QBs, and yes Teddy leaves a lot to be desired, but by fixating on QB, you and others are widely missing the 800-pound gorilla in the room. And we've got some good and great pieces on defense, but our DC has a tendency to call the game like an old lady.

We're middle of the pack defensively in both yards and points allowed. Everyone expected our D to be one of the very worst in the league. If anything, our D has exceeded expectations this year.

Meanwhile, we're 28th in the league in passing touchdowns. 800 pound gorilla in the room missed indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...