Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dane Bruglers updated top 10 mock draft


Martin

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Julio said:

Lance is way too much of a project to me. He could work out or be another QB with all the athleticism in the world but lacking arm talent. Sure, he can throw pretty far but he lacks accuracy, touch and arm angles that elite prospects have. 
 

Sometimes the stats do tell the whole story, NDSU vs their first “real” competition against James Madison in the Championship game only asked Lance to throw 10 passes on a clear day while he rushed the ball 30 times. He completed 6 passes while running for 166 yards. I’d be hesitant to take Lance, give me someone with more arm talent than just an athletic profile.

This isn’t true. He has shown he can do all of this, the point is consistency and experience. Which is why he is raw and needs time.  But he possesses nfl traits. That’s why scouts are clamoring about him. He would need time for sure. I don’t think that’s really debatable. 

Jmu blitzed Lance all game and made them pay with his legs. 
 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Even if Lance is our guy and not one of the more “pro ready” guys, I don’t want him in the bench for more than 2.5 games. I can’t stomach another season of Teddy and there’s no better way to learn than to do. 

I’d sit him for a year. But if we did draft him I’d bet he’d be starting by week 6 because teddy is so abysmal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jared Patterson said:

VERGE,

Do you still believe Panthers will draft a QB if the 4th option is available? Which I still think would be an outstanding QB and the correct move in my opinion. 

Not verge but IMO they have absolutely no other option.  They have to get someone in there ASAP in order to get them ready because Teddy is just so bad.  If its Mac Jones at 9 or wherever then so be it if Brady and co evaluate him thoroughly.  They are not going to sign another vet, they cannot cut TB and they sure as hell cannot trot Teddy out there next season with the expectation of him starting 16 games.  Thats another wasted year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, t96 said:

I think Lance has the best chance of the non-Lawrence QBs to wind up being the best QB in this class. Also a chance he busts but his upside is truly insane. I'd take him at 9 or wherever we pick in a heartbeat and sit him behind Teddy for a year. We'd be in great shape.

I like the fact that they say he's the hardest worker.  Gives me some sense of comfort that he won't come in thinking he's the next PM.  

I believe that if Rhule selects him, he meets the criteria to be a Panther.  Many might not believe me but I believe that each and every player both FA and draftee will have to meet this criteria.  Fast, Smart, Athletic.  

As you said the situation is perfect to bring him in and sit behind TB.  I would also be quick to pull the plug on TB if he continues to keep us close but not winning.  If we aren't going to be winning might as well let the rookie earn his blood strip. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, t96 said:

I think Lance has the best chance of the non-Lawrence QBs to wind up being the best QB in this class. Also a chance he busts but his upside is truly insane. I'd take him at 9 or wherever we pick in a heartbeat and sit him behind Teddy for a year. We'd be in great shape.

Too bad we're probably going to win again on Sunday and go to like pick 15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jared Patterson said:

VERGE,

Do you still believe Panthers will draft a QB if the 4th option is the only one available? Which I still think would be an outstanding QB and the correct move in my opinion. 

People need to quit thinking in terms of ranking, either you have the appropriate grade on him to draft him in the top 10 or you don't.  Doesn't matter if he is the 2nd, 4th, or 6th QB taken.

Lets be honest, most of the season we all thought we would end up drafting in that 6-10 range, everyone got a bit excited when we got close to the top-3.  Since the beginning I've always thought that our most likely QB to draft would be QB4.  I just hope we don't have to trade up to insure it, but I would consider it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...