Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Early pulse check: Curtis won't take a hometown discount, what do we do?


Rags

Recommended Posts

Let's say we've already gotten the Moton situation under control in this hypothetical. Knowing that D.J. Will want to get paid the next season as well as 2021 being Robby's contract year, how should we handle Curtis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GOAT said:

I think that he will be gone unfortunately.

the good news is that Brady has done a lot to develop our receivers and can probably mold another player with similar measurables.

 

I agree, but it is worrying because Curt is a 4 year pro. A lot of what he's done is little savy veteran stuff. Not sure a rook can come in and replace him.

This is why I was on the Ja'Mar Chase train when we were at 3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robby Anderson is a one trick pony.  Samuel is a Swiss army knife.  The question shouldn't be if we pay Samuel, it should be do we pay Anderson in when he hits FA.  The simple answer is no, make that determination now and earmark his money towards Samuel this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love Samuel and I feel vindicated that he turned out to be a good pro when we got an OC worth a damn, but he's gone. We'll probably draft someone like Chris Olave (if he declares) or Anthony Schwartz in the middle rounds to replace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

zero reason to keep him unless we can trade Robby without a hit (I don't know) and sign Curtis to less money than Robby was due.

CMC will be back, we can always take a WR in the 2nd or 3rd round, and we have much bigger needs like OL, LB, and DB to use that money towards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t go back and look at the espn but there live it definitely said 1 shot 1 goal when it happened. I guess they had not added them yet. Still allowing goals that early is rough. Blue line is a total disaster still. Even with Slavin back. Miller and Nikishin keep making mistakes after mistakes. 
    • I generally disagree with the concept of picking a position because of value early in the draft. For instance, if there's a really good safety, RB or ILB at pick 10, I'm choosing him over a project WR or DE. Better players make the team better. A bunch of ok players will give you an ok team. The number 1 goal of the draft should be to improve the overall talent on the team. Not to fill positions of need.  Deciding beforehand that you're picking a LT in the first or second round because Ickey went down is not the way to improve the team. Now if Dan has similar grades on 2 or 3 players and one happens to be a LT, then yeah go for it. But don't pass on your guy at ILB because you have a gap at LT or need to improve the pass rush with a DE. When those guys don't pan out then you haven't improved your team. But that LB could have been a franchise cornerstone for years to come. See Luke Kuechly and Christian McCaffrey. 
    • Thank God we are inthe NFC South--
×
×
  • Create New...