Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who would you like to see as the new OC if Brady leaves??


Prash

Recommended Posts

Current NFL guys:

Mike Lafleur - 49ers passing game coordinator.  Brother of Packers head coach Matt LaFleur.

Mike McDaniel - 49ers run game coordinator.

Luke Getsy - Packers passing game coordinator.

Dan Campbell - Saints assistant head coach and TE coach.  Could continue the Saints system already installed by Brady

Joe Lombardi - Saints QB coach. Continue system installed by Brady.

Corrent college guys:

Tony Elliott - Clemson offensive coordinator.

Rhett Lashlee - Hurricanes offensive coordinator.

Garrett Riley - SMU offensive coordinator. Brother of Oklahoma head coach Lincoln Riley.

Tom Herman - Former Texas head coach, more importantly former Ohio State offensive coordinator. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

General expectation is they'll promote RB Coach Jeff Nixon and then backfill that spot.

As it stands now, we also need a quarterback coach. Can't see them just promoting assistant Matt Lombardi but I suppose it's possible.

Don't know that they replace DJ Mangas as he just had kind of a general offensive assistant position, possibly created just to have him aboard since he was a longtime Rhule guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe this at all.
    • His PPG actually did go up a little in Colorado. We will see. I still sort of believe we saw pretty close to the peak of his abilities last year. Not wishing him ill or trashing him in any way. Just tend to believe we did sell high and correctly so.
    • Well, other teams also had an offseason. I honestly agree with him. Right now I have way more faith in Coker ascending then I do XL. I think it's the TE/WR group dragging us down. Plus he does mention that the list was made with WR's very much valued more than RB's and TE's(I understand the thought process). In that context, we have a very aging AT, two "wait and see" second year players(one leaning bust) and a rookie.  I really think this is a very fair rating, on paper and in the offseason. Quite frankly, aside from the aforementioned and aging AT, this is a bunch of guys still trying to prove themselves.  Then when you go to TE, it's easily a bottom 3-4 unit on paper. That is probably being extremely generous.  RB is where we make our hay. Probably a top 5-10 unit. But....he mentions early in the article that he doesn't value the RB units as much.  So, really, it's the weighting of the skill positions that is what really fugs us.
×
×
  • Create New...