Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Chinn Not Named a Rookie of the Year Finalist


Recommended Posts

It's easy to complain, but who are you taking off that list for him?  He definitely wasn't better than Herbert or Jefferson.  I think you take Robinson (although I don't think he's as good as the #s he put up, personally) and Taylor over him too.  I guess that leaves Chase Young, but he's one of the best players on a high-level defense.

It isn't nearly that big of a snub job.  Maybe if this was just defensive players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, woahfraze said:

Since when did they consolidate DROY and OROY into a single award?  This is the "Pepsi Zero" ROY.  Doesn't AP hand out the hardware? 

If he's snubbed from a three player list for AP DROY, then we can complain.  

Yeah, I think this is a separate award. I believe they will still do OROY and DROY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

He was probably never going to be just plain rookie of the year, not with Justin Herbert out there.

Defensive rookie of the year maybe, but pretty much everybody thinks that award is going to Chase Young.

Considering Young is the only defensive player listed, seems pretty clear he is the droy also

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the Pepsi Zero Rookie of the Year award. When it comes to real awards, there's as much league clout there as there is sugar. DROY from the league... now that's an award. 

It'd be like the Oikos Zero Comeback Player of the Year award... just some made up marketing BS. 

(Of course if you get down to it, even the real awards are just marketing BS ... especially the Pro Bowl.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mage said:

It's easy to complain, but who are you taking off that list for him?  He definitely wasn't better than Herbert or Jefferson.  I think you take Robinson (although I don't think he's as good as the #s he put up, personally) and Taylor over him too.  I guess that leaves Chase Young, but he's one of the best players on a high-level defense.

It isn't nearly that big of a snub job.  Maybe if this was just defensive players.

Why are you downplaying Robinson? He was damned good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...