Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rams at Packers Divisional Thread - Your pick?


Zod

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, t96 said:

Not necessarily... 2018 Pats got a bye at 11-5, while Chargers got a road game at 12-4... Falcons in 2016 really were not that good and got a bye at 11-5 and made it to the Super Bowl.  I think byes are definitely a huge advantage and the main reason why so many 1 and 2 seeds over the years have made the SB. 

Giving a couple examples of teams you don't think are the best getting a bye and making the super bowl isn't proof that the bye was important. You can come up with as many examples of even worse teams making it (and even winning) as a wild card team, like the Giants with Eli.

I'm fully willing to say that the bye might make a huge difference. I'm sure it helps; it has to. But until now there's been no way to know for sure how much of a benefit it actually adds. Let's revisit in at least 5 years and compare the 2 seeds like I suggested. That's the best way to control the variables of team strength and home field advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

Playing one less game undoubtedly has to help but it's hard to tease out how much of those numbers can be attributed to the fact that the best teams are the ones that get byes, plus get home field advantage. We can actually control for those variables moving forward. You just compare the number of 2 seeds to make the super bowl in the next 10 years compared to the 2 seeds to make it in the last 10 years. In 10 years from now, I'd definitely be curious to see that data.

It's all of it. Not having to win an extra game. Easier path via the seeding model. Home field advantage. The answer is "yes".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

Giving a couple examples of teams you don't think are the best getting a bye and making the super bowl isn't proof that the bye was important. You can come up with as many examples of even worse teams making it (and even winning) as a wild card team, like the Giants with Eli.

I'm fully willing to say that the bye might make a huge difference. I'm sure it helps; it has to. But until now there's been no way to know for sure how much of a benefit it actually adds. Let's revisit in at least 5 years and compare the 2 seeds like I suggested. That's the best way to control the variables of team strength and home field advantage.

Use some common sense man. I don't care how good the teams are that get the byes, in a league like this where any team can win any game, needing to win 3 games to win it all instead of 4 is a HUGE advantage. You can wait 5+ years to look at the stats if you want, I don't need to do that. It's fairly obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce has been in the NFL 3 years and still looks like a very mediocre QB. Most games are nothing but mediocre plays with a highlight reel every now and then.  He is a very INCONSISTENT QB and it’s very fustrating. He does not deserve a 5th year option, even though the Panthers and all the dumb asses in the front office will give it to him.
    • I’ve rarely ever been more sure of anything than losing out — but how can anyone say with a straight face “Bryce hasn’t improved, but Canales has and he’s masks his flaws”. You have to be so out of touch with reality to put one way above the other when discussing those two. 
    • Last night was the classic example of a visiting team just holding on through the wave of emotion a home team has at the start of a big time game. Bama’s first two kickoff returns really set them back as far as playcalling and allowed OU to dictate field position. The emotion of the home crowd fed into what OU was doing at that point, and it felt like Bama would not be able to overcome that.     Once the kickoff returner was told to fair catch every kick, the game shifted, as Bama wasn’t starting each drive inside their own 15. It was then that Bama was able to make some plays, outscoring OU 34-7 the rest of the way.  I think the last 3/4 of the game proves Bama was the better team. OU was just able to ride the initial wave of emotion to a big lead, but Bama held on just enough.  However, had OU blocked the punt on Bama’s second drive and scored a TD (vice a FG on the ensuing drive), things likely would have been different.  Anyway, Roll Tide!
×
×
  • Create New...