Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford Available

Untouchable

By Untouchable,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, BurnNChinn said:

We need to get him, he would be a heck of an upgrade 

I don't care about "getting an upgrade," the focus needs to be on building a roster that dominates the conference for the long term, with an elite franchise QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KidSmitty89 Newbie

KidSmitty89

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, ncfan said:

This Also means abother team ahead of us in the Draft will be going after a QB

 

 

That Win for the Culture is looking great now, right 

If we lose out on the top 4 QB. I rather we trade back get as many picks as possible. Build a stronger foundation and go all out for  Howell or Rattler

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

If Watson really doesn't want to come here, then this makes sense.   Stafford throwing to our guys could be fun to watch.

I just worry about our offensive line and protecting him.

The good news is we wouldn't have to give up a butt load of 1st round picks and a top player or two of our own.  Makes it easier to build the lines.  If we could keep this years first in the deal I could get behind it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KidSmitty89 Newbie

KidSmitty89

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, spizike99x said:

At 32 he can play at a high level for up to 4 more years and we can be better set up for a Franchise QB in the coming years. If another team snags him first I feel getting Zack Wilson should be the best realistic draft option. 

If he can stay healthy I agree. I’ll hate to give up draft picks while we have a lot of holes to fill for home to be on the sideline holding the clipboards.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Monrowed Grand Master

Monrowed

Posted
Posted

I don’t understand the idea of getting a 33-year-old quarterback who is probably looking at the backside of his career. This reminds me of going to get Teddy Bridgewater when all we need to do was find a quarterback we can build a franchise around. This just seems like a Band-Aid and what we really need is a skin graft.

Draft a rookie QB and prep him for his career behind Teddy B. for half or all season.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Liminy Collaborator

Liminy

Posted
Posted

l don't mind Stafford coming here if it's for nothing big. If we can't get Watson, Stafford could come in and probably have a good year just from the change of scenery and better talent around him. I can't see him lasting longer than a year, we need to have his replacement in this draft if we go the Stafford route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheProcess Rising Star

TheProcess

Posted
Posted

Stafford probably has another 5-6 years in him. We have McCaffrey signed for 5 years. We also have weapons for Stafford on the outside.

We can use picks to build our line and secondary. The rest of the defense is young. 

Saints in cap hell, Brees retiring. 

Falcons in bad cap, Ryan about done.

Bucs can't keep everybody, several older guys nearing the end including Brady.

Seems to set up for a nice little run

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      About as useful as the S2
    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...